Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.127
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.86; '*S*': 0.11; 'python.': 0.02; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'indeed,': 0.09; 'bug': 0.12; 'callable': 0.16; 'callable.': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.4': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'that.': 0.31; 'wrong': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'brain': 0.68; 'legal': 0.71; 'otten': 0.84; 'pardon': 0.84; 'received:195.238': 0.84; 'received:195.238.6': 0.84; 'received:belgacom.be': 0.84; 'received:isp.belgacom.be': 0.84
X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsUDAOkgklJbs/Xy/2dsb2JhbAANTL0rgnkBBgECgTODGQEBAQR4EQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAogCrAKJZYdQF48OFoQdA5gUlTs
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:55:16 +0100
From: Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131005 Icedove/17.0.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3
References: <l6povp$ndp$1@speranza.aioe.org> <l6pqs8$8b4$1@ger.gmane.org> <5290C30D.5060604@rece.vub.ac.be> <l6r7v6$mhj$1@ger.gmane.org> <5291D536.4010606@rece.vub.ac.be> <l6sl7g$92u$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <l6sl7g$92u$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.3141.1385308585.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 14
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1385308585 news.xs4all.nl 15996 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36489
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:60385

Op 24-11-13 11:43, Peter Otten schreef:
> Antoon Pardon wrote:
> 
>> Foo.foo() being legal and Foo.foo not being callable is IMO a bug in
>> python.
> 
> Foo.foo() is legal, and Foo.foo is callable. 

Indeed, I had a kink in my brain which made it difficult to see
where I was going wrong myself. Sorry about that.

-- 
Antoon Pardon