Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'instance,': 0.05; 'constructor': 0.07; 'brackets': 0.09; 'received:209.85.160.174': 0.09; 'received:mail-gy0-f174.google.com': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'characters:': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'usual:': 0.16; 'syntax': 0.16; 'subject:question': 0.17; 'subject:skip:d 10': 0.17; 'wed,': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'marc': 0.18; 'wrap': 0.18; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'string': 0.24; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'nov': 0.29; '\xa0\xa0\xa0': 0.31; 'list': 0.32; 'received:209.85.160': 0.33; 'object': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'skip:" 10': 0.37; 'list,': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'using': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'i.e.': 0.39; 'should': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; '2011': 0.61; 'square': 0.67; '30,': 0.74; "'o']": 0.84; 'composite': 0.84; 'edwards': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8YRV+ihP17MF5rO5xq5/NwRatGgZzF/LvzJqUqis1aI=; b=PzxB2tQnEf7C0zaG83nl32mWNU7E17TJ3wleUTwm86iVyrp1n4+oOuQZ9/w5JgYUkv Mz/5RkOAbmtWkEgdlyRQ8gmKQLQUHqD193JKjHDFJp3sHoBiCa9JnvRzplvEFCQlkljK a4QYWt91mcfx0mfhROxHlHf9Uk6x0cg8QKf7E= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4ED4F890.70201@gmail.com> References: <4ED4F890.70201@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:59:40 +1100 Subject: Re: Amateur question on class definitions... From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1322582383 news.xs4all.nl 6876 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59239 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16396 On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:21 AM, J. Marc Edwards w= rote: > =A0=A0=A0 ...a list of "a_workflows", i.e. a composite workflow, should I= use this > syntax? > =A0=A0=A0 set_of_workflows =3D list(a_workflow) > This would be usual: set_of_workflows =3D [a_workflow] Using the list() constructor directly is for when you have some other iterable; for instance, a string is iterable over its characters: >>> list("Hello") ['H', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o'] When you want to wrap up a single object in a list, square brackets syntax is what you want. ChrisA