Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.130 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.75; '*S*': 0.01; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:44:44 -0600 From: Michael Torrie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: RE Module Performance References: <51f14395$0$29971$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <51f15e03$0$29971$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <8203e802-9dc5-44c5-9547-6e1947ee224b@googlegroups.com> <43ce1b65-9d6d-47dd-b209-9a3bbafc0b8c@googlegroups.com> <51F7CFD1.1090403@rece.vub.ac.be> <51F7E634.2030200@mrabarnett.plus.com> <51F7EC41.5010704@rece.vub.ac.be> <51F7F48F.3070803@mrabarnett.plus.com> <39155ddf-437c-459e-ad7c-dd841810a592@googlegroups.com> <797da2f0-5f62-43b9-ab4d-c5eb8d6c64a2@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <797da2f0-5f62-43b9-ab4d-c5eb8d6c64a2@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 4 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1375281891 news.xs4all.nl 15948 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38958 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:51664 On 07/31/2013 02:32 AM, wxjmfauth@gmail.com wrote: > Unicode/utf* Why do you keep using the terms "utf" and "Unicode" interchangeably?