Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'example:': 0.03; 'python': 0.08; 'from:addr:python': 0.09; 'readable': 0.09; 'wed,': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'blah': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'iterators,': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'received:84.92': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122.60': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'reply-to:addr :python-list': 0.16; '>>>': 0.16; 'meant': 0.17; 'say,': 0.19; 'loop': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'code.': 0.22; 'loop,': 0.23; 'objects,': 0.23; 'tried': 0.27; 'received:84': 0.28; 'elements': 0.29; 'example': 0.30; 'not.': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'certainly': 0.32; 'references': 0.32; 'does': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'it?': 0.34; 'regardless': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.35; 'limitation': 0.37; 'sequence': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'steven': 0.38; 'something': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'allows': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'did': 0.40; 'believe': 0.66; '"do': 0.67; 'jun': 0.67; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.72; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'concept': 0.73; 'idiom': 0.84; 'sequence:': 0.84 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuIHADOJAk5UXebj/2dsb2JhbABTmEWOV3eIdcEKhi0Elk+LKA Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:34:50 +0100 From: MRAB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: writable iterators? References: <4e026497$0$29975$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: python-list@python.org List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 28 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1308789287 news.xs4all.nl 14142 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:50695 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8251 On 23/06/2011 00:10, Neal Becker wrote: > Steven D'Aprano wrote: > >> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:23 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >> >>> AFAICT, the python iterator concept only supports readable iterators, >>> not write. Is this true? >>> >>> for example: >>> >>> for e in sequence: >>> do something that reads e >>> e = blah # will do nothing >>> >>> I believe this is not a limitation on the for loop, but a limitation on >>> the python iterator concept. Is this correct? >> >> Have you tried it? "e = blah" certainly does not "do nothing", regardless >> of whether you are in a for loop or not. It binds the name e to the value >> blah. >> > > Yes, I understand that e = blah just rebinds e. I did not mean this as an > example of working code. I meant to say, does Python have any idiom that allows > iteration over a sequence such that the elements can be assigned? > [snip] Python has references to objects, but not references to references.