Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.006 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Django': 0.03; 'python': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'django': 0.10; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:popular': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'tim': 0.18; 'sort': 0.21; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'environment.': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'deploy': 0.29; 'drupal': 0.29; 'johnson': 0.32; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'except': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'speak': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'easy': 0.60; 'experience.': 0.65; 'believe': 0.69; '2013': 0.84; 'indifferent': 0.84; 'received:sd.cox.net': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: python-list@python.org To: python-list@python.org From: rh Subject: Re: Why is Ruby on Rails more popular than Django? Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 20:43:32 -0800 References: <2fc87695-9d0b-45b3-ae96-98e0591b30a0@googlegroups.com> <1362594259.18860.140661200857865.2591DE46@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20130306191635.GO17836@mail.akwebsoft.com> <1362622380.6289.140661201030025.4479DE68@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20130307025512.GV17836@mail.akwebsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-227-87-145.sb.sd.cox.net User-Agent: dsodnetnin X-Mailer: EZnn0.37p X-Newsreader: EZnn0.37p X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: EZnn0.37p Original-Received: from slem by 1.1 with local X-No-Archive: yes Archive: no X-Archive: expiry=11 X-Archive: encrypt X-Operating-System: Barebones_6.1 X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.168.1.1 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.168.1.1 Mail-Copies-To: never X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1362717774 news.xs4all.nl 6840 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36829 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:40843 On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:55:12 -0900 Tim Johnson wrote: > > I believe that indifference on the part of Python to fastcgi is a > self-inflicted wound. I don't believe that there is any good > excuse for such indifference, except for a sort of bureaucratic > inertia. It's sad, when you consider how well python is designed Python is not indifferent to fastcgi, django is indifferent to fastcgi. > and how crappily PHP is designed and how easy it is to set up and > deploy drupal in the same environment. I speak from my own > experience.