Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Stephen Hansen Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Code Opinion - Enumerate Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 22:24:58 -0700 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <0a2a0652-85c2-4283-a3c4-3ca8bc4e5481@googlegroups.com> <1462166698.1168771.595278561.2A184D4B@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de VSoUUBhbBkXgz1uf3u3GeQdAzoJininDtdidDcZ/2MUQ== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.014 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'used.': 0.05; 'received:internal': 0.09; '(something': 0.16; 'message- id:@webmail.messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:10.202': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2': 0.16; 'received:66.111': 0.16; 'received:66.111.4': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'friend.': 0.22; 'stephen': 0.22; 'subject:Code': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'continually': 0.29; 'index,': 0.29; 'code': 0.30; "can't": 0.32; 'instead,': 0.33; 'comment': 0.35; 'item': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'received:66': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'hug': 0.84; 'increases': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ixokai.io; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=G1P3fOcCFAphLhIT6LnVVJeHDSw=; b=W6oSCf eWlPomizNeDIkMmUDnLR+4wgGyyEBViNT8J0Hz6jiDxFWzI5+soTSGA3eftqe8BN bCEHTTw83guf/n9yj4k1PH1vqlIscoZHV8FJsMN1ajstyDca7qlkKK+rAVygJZPC yEXyXmZNCkvRspNeR0yeDQ0yn5y5x6bnsHlP8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=G1P3fOcCFAphLhI T6LnVVJeHDSw=; b=rgo8BqDyD2Xr3dNvXkO3ZP67zsXdU01w0kF9cc3kp++3L+E o2XUVXR/Whi/YkqAO1FhQ8qjSr+hPKAkuTlZaUkXoGQnJVovquQjR8ntz/naLnWc kPskzXpqXo49XuOKIvQAxV4KcMxrmpAphspFPXGWB11hk2yesZJRVtn6M9Mk= X-Sasl-Enc: HWO2CC88OZE2HEjWrmqlzTndyrJmNbUK+wIvxl5keVWZ 1462166698 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-491eb5a4 In-Reply-To: <0a2a0652-85c2-4283-a3c4-3ca8bc4e5481@googlegroups.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <1462166698.1168771.595278561.2A184D4B@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Mailman-Original-References: <0a2a0652-85c2-4283-a3c4-3ca8bc4e5481@googlegroups.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:107985 On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 08:17 PM, Sayth Renshaw wrote: > Just looking for your opinion on style would you write it like this > continually calling range or would you use enumerate instead, or neither > (something far better) ? I can't comment on your specific code because there's too much noise to it, but in general: Using enumerate increases readability, and I use it whenever the idiom: for index, item in enumerate(thing): ... is used. Enumerate is your friend. Hug it. -- Stephen Hansen m e @ i x o k a i . i o