Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.008 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'lines.': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'tab': 0.07; 'demanding': 0.09; 'successive': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.13; 'received:mail-iy0-f174.google.com': 0.13; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; "guido's": 0.16; 'meant': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'alternate': 0.18; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'indentation': 0.23; 'code': 0.25; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; '27,': 0.29; 'nov': 0.29; 'lines': 0.30; 'sun,': 0.30; 'equivalent': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'identical': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'being': 0.39; 'johnson': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'hope': 0.61; '2011': 0.61; 'worth': 0.61; 'here.': 0.66; 'spaces': 0.73; 'spaces.': 0.84; 'subject:Reference': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZaJjYx2EvOrPaHK77Yif25AVLU+wDhdJVnusOZU0RN8=; b=DiWWwKS+yN19Ax/qffGKtAknpft8IJ+e2sckIjrnh6fu3IA4ne/S6R87TBADjKKhhk GX3wkmjn2zeULitF3ZYOpuiCc+8R2RV8qrifsALPqs8bjmGHwllGa13QaRzEDl4t5Ba+ /+pzqZudPK+T3JrNokoSw5a5791nltovS+DHA= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <79379487-0081-4067-92ed-c6717652e1ff@y7g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 06:34:25 +1100 Subject: Re: Using the Python Interpreter as a Reference From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1322336069 news.xs4all.nl 6846 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55363 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16260 On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Rick Johnson wrote: > I hope you meant to say "*forced* indention for code blocks"! "Forced" > being the key word here. What about tabs over spaces, have you decided > the worth of one over the other or are you going to repeat Guido's > folly? I recommend demanding that indentation strictly alternate tabs or spaces in successive non-blank lines. Comment-only lines must be identical to the immediately-preceding line. A tab is equivalent to seven spaces. End the ambiguity! ChrisA