Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'received:134': 0.05; 'subject:code': 0.07; '"if': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'way:': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; 'iteration.': 0.16; 'message-id:@dough.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'yield': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'work.': 0.23; 'this:': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'actual': 0.28; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'loop,': 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'writes:': 0.29; 'function': 0.30; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'skip:d 20': 0.34; 'received:org': 0.36; 'expensive': 0.36; 'skip:p 20': 0.36; 'item': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'more': 0.63; 'subject:running': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Serhiy Storchaka Subject: Re: conditional running of code portion Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 23:59:59 +0300 References: <0a61aed2-bd14-4022-bf59-a3bb3af55b3c@sn4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <501e1319$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87hasg0x9b.fsf@handshake.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.249.75.209 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 In-Reply-To: <87hasg0x9b.fsf@handshake.de> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 44 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1344286819 news.xs4all.nl 6851 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:32861 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:26659 On 06.08.12 20:02, Dieter Maurer wrote: > Serhiy Storchaka writes: >> On 05.08.12 09:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >>> If you are working in a tight loop, you can do this: >>> >>> if VERBOSE_FLAG: >>> for item in loop: >>> print(DEBUG_INFORMATION) >>> do_actual_work(item) >>> else: >>> for item in loop: >>> do_actual_work(item) >> >> Or this: >> >> if VERBOSE_FLAG: >> def do_work(item): >> print(DEBUG_INFORMATION) >> do_actual_work(item) >> else: >> do_work = do_actual_work >> >> for item in loop: >> do_work(item) > > Be warned: a function call is *much* more expensive than an > "if variable:". As any actual work. As iteration. Yet one way: def verbose_iter(it): for i in it: print(DEBUG_INFORMATION) yield i ... if VERBOSE_FLAG: loop = verbose_iter(loop) for item in loop: do_work(item)