Path: csiph.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!uio.no!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!nzpost1.xs4all.net!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.082 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.84; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'mainframe,': 0.16; 'nick': 0.16; 'run.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '2015': 0.20; 'sep': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'somewhere': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'fri,': 0.27; 'processed': 0.27; 'queue': 0.29; 'probably': 0.31; 'post': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.34; 'that,': 0.34; 'happened': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'him': 0.60; 'close': 0.61; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'minutes': 0.64; 'finally': 0.70; 'light,': 0.91 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 21:27:47 -0600 From: Michael Torrie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Einstein's Riddle References: <1cef1669-1a62-4fe8-ac31-6fff385e77ed@googlegroups.com> <55fbda7c$0$1646$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1442719678 news.xs4all.nl 23760 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34020 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:96861 On 09/18/2015 03:51 AM, Nick Sarbicki wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Steven D'Aprano >> Time is relative. Perhaps the poster has been travelling at close to the >> speed of light, and for him it is only a few minutes after the original >> post was sent. > > I prefer to think that it just took him this long to do it. Probably what happened is some computer somewhere was finally rebooted after 15 years of uptime, and this messages finally was processed after years stuck in the queue. I read once of a university that, upon decomissioning a mainframe, found a job that had been in the queue for many years but had never run. Probably some poor grad student's job.