Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.029 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'granted,': 0.07; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'subject:using': 0.09; 'yeah,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; '"to': 0.16; ':-/': 0.16; 'courts': 0.16; 'exactly,': 0.16; 'mandate': 0.16; 'to:addr:python.list': 0.16; 'to:addr:tim.thechases.com': 0.16; 'to:name:tim chase': 0.16; 'bit': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'basis,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'respective': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'sets': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'spirit': 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'regular': 0.32; 'framework': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'useful': 0.36; 'clear': 0.37; 'no.': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'times': 0.62; 'world': 0.66; 'commercial': 0.71; 'miss': 0.74; 'article': 0.77; 'exclusive': 0.81; 'misses': 0.84; 'thesis': 0.91; 'washington': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VN5GJfJOqqy4q1P/e0iXN8c5lLklaBzVyqD42utNIVg=; b=DpABrSH6ZaDLiiZrgQpPMqZM8gVrLzc/jpxLfRLP6cLcTFppxEKWA+mhECDRrMHT92 5bGR7AXmTslj7KYeDOgXYHy+n6dkRqp4doDzTL29W8RVO2TpcnqIdyp/2siu7D875k/8 LKIhBx0Dq3HZmg0TM7E9fF/Kd2ZAFaXZ/VLmlVEsaq7dUdeTP0ySHgfO2c6Ig61D5T4X KOb+gBl38Mqc7bN1OKiYf5wnMY01kvdK9Skpmfg2rqFpmcukMSRpGJVgNUG7giF2Yh/f I5jp9eovTXvCJExZ1hb6VEAM/hDbKjGq/Uj+hGM0wpZ7BqYvFSn5+9dPELaFVosw6lLd JxSw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.183.40 with SMTP id ej8mr2179138wic.37.1370833025661; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:57:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130609214859.5b7179c1@bigbox.christie.dr> References: <51B450C1.5030506@berlin.de> <51B4DCA2.9000903@gmail.com> <51b51d42$0$30001$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <20130609214859.5b7179c1@bigbox.christie.dr> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 19:57:05 -0700 Subject: Re: Re-using copyrighted code From: Mark Janssen To: Tim Chase Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "python-list@python.org" X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1370833034 news.xs4all.nl 15891 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59612 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:47512 > What is clear is the mandate that sets up the framework in the first > place: > > "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing > for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to > their respective Writings and Discoveries" > -- USC Article I, Section 8 > > If it doesn't "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts", then > it misses the spirit of the law as drafted. Exactly, academia has known what this is intuitively for some time. It's just the commercial world and the populace at large that is confused and exploited. This also disproves Steven D'Aprano's thesis that monopoly rights is its purpose, but no. > Granted, courts seem to miss that interpretation on a regular basis, > leaving me a bit disgusted at the whole mess. :-/ Yeah, and stranger is that people *defend* the interpretation which *takes away* their rights! Bizarre! -- MarkJ Tacoma, Washington