Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!noc.nerim.net!nerim.net!novso.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'compiler': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; 'guys.': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'sure,': 0.09; 'language,': 0.11; 'language': 0.14; 'weird': 0.15; 'ah,': 0.16; 'both.': 0.16; 'compiler,': 0.16; 'compiler?': 0.16; 'distinct': 0.16; 'from:addr:behnel.de': 0.16; 'from:addr:stefan_ml': 0.16; 'from:name:stefan behnel': 0.16; 'message-id:@dough.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'say.': 0.16; 'stefan': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'language.': 0.27; 'plain': 0.27; 'c++': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'implies': 0.29; 'definition': 0.29; 'file': 0.32; 'received:84': 0.32; 'qualify': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'languages': 0.33; 'so,': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'rather': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'takes': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'thomas': 0.62; 'different': 0.63; 'skip:n 10': 0.63; 'talking': 0.66; 'compiles': 0.84; 'received:arcor-ip.net': 0.84; 'received:pools .arcor-ip.net': 0.84; 'sorry.': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Stefan Behnel Subject: Re: On-topic: alternate Python implementations Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 16:03:30 +0200 References: <501cbdf8$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <501cd421$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dslb-084-056-025-029.pools.arcor-ip.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1344089022 news.xs4all.nl 6940 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42757 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:26486 Stefan Behnel, 04.08.2012 15:53: > Thomas Rachel, 04.08.2012 14:51: >> Am 04.08.2012 11:10 schrieb Stefan Behnel: >>> As long as you don't use any features of the Cython language, it's plain >>> Python. That makes it a Python compiler in my eyes. >> >> Tell that the C++ guys. C++ is mainly a superset of C. But nevertheless, C >> and C++ are distinct languages and so are Python and Cython. > > So, if a C++ compiler takes a .c file and compiles it with C language > semantics, it doesn't qualify as a C compiler? That implies a rather weird > definition of a C compiler, I'd say. Ah, sorry. Got it. You were again talking about Cython the language. Sure, Cython the language is different from Python the language. Cython the compiler can compile both. Stefan