Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'operator': 0.03; 'none:': 0.05; 'differently': 0.07; 'expressions': 0.07; 'puts': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'behave': 0.09; 'subject:while': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; 'sat,': 0.15; 'backward': 0.16; 'expression.': 0.16; 'foo()': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'operator.': 0.16; 'personally,': 0.16; 'subject:expression': 0.16; 'syntax.': 0.16; 'ternary': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'exists': 0.17; 'variable': 0.20; 'do.': 0.21; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.21; 'assignment': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; '(which': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'convention': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'skip:( 20': 0.28; 'chris': 0.28; 'comparison': 0.29; 'end,': 0.29; 'statements': 0.29; 'unlikely': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'fri,': 0.30; 'print': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'everyone': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'wrong': 0.34; 'compared': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'possible': 0.37; 'itself': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'quite': 0.37; 'rather': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'side': 0.61; 'truly': 0.62; 'results': 0.65; '26,': 0.65; 'bar:': 0.84; 'confusing': 0.84; 'enhancement.': 0.84; 'subtly': 0.84
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SJXGKBcnnXK+4DckhGR/39P3dSh4YQohkCZPLqZE4lg=; b=S+v5MxcYlrjH6bAdCfVTnTuy2mOSHMsp4ClSnplHXA+JY7tOqgP/ZbSig/n5BYhKgD E+OS0qwzGsBh57WX1nphm608Ufs8Aofuo5YZU/Wv72DbZ9Gy77DLELETpyBPl9AA06MH dpyt8etDn3JXdHQwp8Km/ql0yUJifUpIjYIRvagvsnxi1rESojw2z2p8lwvCNIkOa1x+ /jJy80+l5H7TPbc28MlCvemf85J9YQg7khXea4SrLG81GNQK1W3Rzt30qBZXXGNJxV8N sQmATTJjd4KU/g9JwNQSgJGJ5aKEtsG7Guz7XogzobQ4c4FHZX/n7huOXMh0zTmGd+oX 5kYQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABicbJJ073VyhsikKsqF-AhLcriAKdfd8qoTAO3B0OAyYUT-mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOKWLrERVuT-u=9YZGnQUhWLv2M6F06pU20vG9W1joD9h-SdSQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidm1zj5ZR4YU-DCWBgY3Q4m=UC0BNs3qJfwYpV+Kh+21cg@mail.gmail.com> <50886398.5050301@tim.thechases.com> <mailman.2803.1351119286.27098.python-list@python.org> <7x7gqf1na2.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <mailman.2807.1351121989.27098.python-list@python.org> <k6apaa$eid$1@r03.glglgl.gl> <mailman.2854.1351183039.27098.python-list@python.org> <k6c8kh$lqj$1@r03.glglgl.gl> <f3e3c344-8a7d-46f7-b499-144775c7f9aa@googlegroups.com> <7x7gqdzs1i.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <CAPTjJmqhw8w2G=vqHt=LpWejLFG16npgZk6CbBBG0d1CMnhAoA@mail.gmail.com> <CABicbJJ073VyhsikKsqF-AhLcriAKdfd8qoTAO3B0OAyYUT-mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 11:42:25 +1100
Subject: Re: while expression feature proposal
From: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To: python-list@python.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.2926.1351298548.27098.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 35
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1351298548 news.xs4all.nl 6860 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57258
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:32258

On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Devin Jeanpierre
<jeanpierreda@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
>> while (client.spop("profile_ids") as profile_id) is not None:
>>     print profile_id
>>
>> Why is everyone skirting around C-style assignment expressions as
>> though they're simultaneously anathema and the goal? :)
>
> Why should these two statements behave differently? :(
>
>     with foo() as bar: bar.baz()
>     with (foo() as bar): bar.baz()
>
> I don't understand why everyone is so attached to this "as" syntax.
> It's confusing because it behaves subtly differently than how it works
> in "with", and it puts the variable on the wrong side of the
> assignment operator.
>
> (I've always been partial to ":=", personally.)

I'm not attached to "as", myself. It puts the variable at the wrong
end, and feels backward compared to a convention that exists elsewhere
in the language (regular variable assignment). This is a much stronger
backwardness issue than the Python ternary operator (which is only
backward in comparison to other languages).

Personally, I'm quite happy with assignment itself being an
expression. But since that's unlikely to be directly accepted in
Python, I would be looking for something as general as possible -
something that can truly be used _anywhere_ - rather than a specific
while-statement enhancement. Capturing partial expression results is
an extremely convenient thing to do.

ChrisA