Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.023 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'portions': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:using': 0.09; 'psf': 0.10; 'happily': 0.16; 'license.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'file,': 0.19; 'seems': 0.21; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'package.': 0.24; 'source': 0.25; 'least': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'statement': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'asked': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'lines': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'open': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; "i'll": 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'free': 0.61; 'pick': 0.64; 'license': 0.66; 'due': 0.66; 'reply': 0.66; 'caused': 0.69; 'received:93': 0.72; 'secret': 0.74; 'ab.': 0.84; 'implications': 0.84; 'package?': 0.84; 'relate': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Malte Forkel Subject: Re: Re-using copyrighted code Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 15:21:43 +0200 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5ddb2b3a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 18 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1370784115 news.xs4all.nl 15999 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49226 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:47462 I have asked the PSF for help regarding the implications of the license status of code from sre_parse.py and the missing license statement in sre.py. I'll happily report their answer to the list I they don't reply in this thread. At least partially, my confusion seems to be caused by the dichotomy of the concepts of copyright and license. How do these relate to each other? I understand that I have to pick a license for my package. And may be I'm not free to pick any open source license due the license used by Secret Labs AB. But how does that relate to the copyright statements? Should I put my own copyright line in every source file in the package? How about the file that re-uses portions of sre_parse.py? Can there or should there be two copyright lines in that file, one from Secret Labs, one my own? Malte