Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.042 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'python': 0.08; 'none)': 0.09; 'reply-to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'def': 0.14; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.15; '(functions': 0.16; 'above?': 0.16; 'bieber': 0.16; 'declaimed': 0.16; 'subject:pass': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'defined': 0.19; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.23; 'cc:2**0': 0.25; 'statement': 0.25; 'lee': 0.28; 'pass': 0.28; 'explicit': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'implicitly': 0.30; 'equivalent': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'nov': 0.31; 'thu,': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; '17,': 0.34; 'subject:What': 0.34; 'none': 0.36; 'thursday,': 0.36; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'ok,': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'skip:_ 10': 0.40; 'received:209': 0.40; 'john': 0.62; '2011': 0.62; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.70; 'reply- to:no real name:2**0': 0.71; 'reply-to:addr:googlegroups.com': 0.73; 'dennis': 0.77; '-0800': 0.84; 'subject:should': 0.84; 'received:209.85.210.56': 0.93; 'received:mail- pz0-f56.google.com': 0.93 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:07:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.36.147.124; posting-account=aVGMWgkAAAB6mGKt34gyuFhFeGnfZNcf References: <27955957.352.1321582691251.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prap37> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? From: John Ladasky To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 18 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1321592848 news.xs4all.nl 6872 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38023 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:15867 On Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:34:22 PM UTC-8, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:18:11 -0800 (PST), John Ladasky > declaimed the following in > gmane.comp.python.general: > > def _pass(*args): > > pass > > > This is the equivalent of > > def _pass(*args): > return None > > (functions with no explicit return statement implicitly return None) OK, that works for me, and now I understand. One of my questions was: would there be any merit to having the Python "pass" token itself defined exactly as _pass() is defined above?