Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=rebertia.com; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=KoUCwtrrisCArIWFh4LkV2AINunQXS65Ay9M2hqbtVpQ4un13E7HphTb3yWmk7W6DI u3GM4zYYTPUBDNfZsb3MsQ9lxN0FrcgdA8YeX6lOrciiUsD2byDyh9biJFGX98SjMGnu PwiH6A9xe1KFWyEu6Sy9Erfz3U4UK2qM/eT4k=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: chris@rebertia.com
In-Reply-To: <87k4eze4dl.fsf@mithlond.arda>
References: <8abff237-5ccd-4eb6-85c8-cdc9e87520b7@bl1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <mailman.233.1302568099.9059.python-list@python.org> <87k4eze4dl.fsf@mithlond.arda>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:26:48 -0700
Subject: Re: Feature suggestion -- return if true
From: Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com>
To: Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: python-list@python.org
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.282.1302640011.9059.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 47
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3087

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> wrote:
> * 2011-04-12T10:27:55+10:00 * James Mills wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:17 AM, zildjohn01 <zildjohn01@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>>> This is an idea I've had bouncing around in my head for a long time
>>> now. I propose the following syntax:
>>
>> Maybe this is more appropriare for the python-ideas list ?
>>
>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0return? expr
>>
>> This syntax does not fit well within python ideology.
>
> I'm a simple Lisp guy who wonders if it is be possible to add some kind
> of macros to the language. Then features like this could be added by
> anybody. Lisp people do this all the time and there is no need for
> feature requests or any discussions.

I think Ben "Yahtzee" Croshaw's comments on open-world sandbox video
games (of all things) have a lot of applicability to why allowing
full-on macros can be a bad idea.

Paraphrasing liberally from his review of Far Cry 2:
"Letting the [programmer] create their own [language constructs is]
always done at the expense of proper [orthogonality, elegance, and
coherence]. Maybe sometimes I don't want to create my own [programming
language] experience. Maybe I want to have an experience that's been
carefully crafted by professional [language] designers and
[architects]. But [a] delusion has arisen that absolutely anyone can
contribute something valid, regardless of qualifications. In TV news
for example, you'll often see them pause to hear the opinion of a
seventy-five-year-old housebound racist from Lemington. And now you
get [languages] like [Lisp] that rely heavily on user-made [language
constructs]. Which I prophesise doom for, because most people are not
[language] designers, and you're just going to end up with oceans of
slurry, as indeed we have. It's like giving someone a stack of paper
and a [pen] and claiming that that's as good as the latest [New York
Times] bestseller."

IOW, a language is usually better for having such discussions and
having a fairly coherent worldview enforced by the existence of a
managing authority.

Cheers,
Chris
--
http://blog.rebertia.com