Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!cs.uu.nl!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.122 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.77; '*S*': 0.01; 'wednesday,': 0.07; 'subject: [': 0.09; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'subject:"]': 0.16; 'suppose.': 0.16; 'url:catb': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'programming': 0.22; 'subject:problem': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'along': 0.30; 'lines': 0.31; 'implicit': 0.31; 'fri,': 0.33; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'johnson': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'actions': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'bad': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'most': 0.60; 'name': 0.63; 'kind': 0.63; 'subject:The': 0.64; 'of:': 0.68; 'url:e': 0.78; '"hey,': 0.84; 'ranks': 0.84; 'rick': 0.93; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tpntrdxo+QRsCA5jmYabwAVIqyjPz+M8B5swECfzCls=; b=fwSavU5duJqnQzxuCPXF9YnqsVaYiYH2YECHBp41tqSvkwpksHuOHcJHZOjiOdv+68 HxCL8mcjtOysIN4eIhFgHkuGuWUUOpqt+ps7pdFWDDRDnexWa5F4dqyCpP0Cfn0NvoNC ir7YHG/HRqqlOfVW9P3CjvI+1ZFYefeq5yS9+ogO6bwKkgxl8zwsxDbSFh1jvSm7hCnA aTtLmZntLV7wrDIAFQlImtouwTsZRtwXkkM0NfNgoHY5SYi/9fkbPrVONdfJZu/4B3ND t02SJ7AVjyNB4P75cCT/+kr5RiCj5g36zZIZ2Lj/HyIMayLDhMuYeaqjk0sow+NgTgDM uJng== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.215.73 with SMTP id hd9mr22641405vcb.19.1370537952816; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:59:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7127916f-7d8a-418b-bda1-595e5bde8cbd@googlegroups.com> References: <687dea63-84da-4c45-9366-cb5a10665d1f@googlegroups.com> <51ab95d5$0$29966$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <51ad7daf$0$11118$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <7127916f-7d8a-418b-bda1-595e5bde8cbd@googlegroups.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 02:59:12 +1000 Subject: Re: Bools and explicitness [was Re: PyWart: The problem with "print"] From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1370537956 news.xs4all.nl 15990 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36780 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:47245 On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Rick Johnson wrote: > On Wednesday, June 5, 2013 2:15:57 AM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote: >> [...] >> I cannot name a single modern programming language that does NOT have >> some kind of implicit boolification. > > Congrats: Again you join the ranks of most children who make excuses for their foolish actions along the lines of: > > "Hey, they did it first!" > > Well, the lemmings get what they deserve i suppose. You say that like it's a bad thing. http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/E/ELIZA-effect.html ChrisA