Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <joel.goldstick@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.077
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.86; '*S*': 0.01; 'think,': 0.07; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'anyway': 0.14; 'implementing': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'fixed.': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'up.': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'url:listinfo': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'matter': 0.61; 'joel': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.92
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=BPd31k7pqcLP/Uc82Igavkryj1KOU6OPY3esb4Jg4aY=; b=wbBbg+wyNfYidcS/kYyP7gLv6Wdwj9yOcLeECWzEHoxhgsnQ3obUOCf04pd3f81V7z tyMu43RJPyjeZ6UISpbHWZ/UmBx+EkQII5eZBp3gCjM2lCmDPGbW5Uam6hsH8ezyPOG1 43KY9tXyFKFRMhRo/hRtrXBVfXz/TZkkVYytoMassEV+RZFA1B5uZ9BpHQkxQ0UwytZM xXlDRJYkX2FQ9Aws0lPClk6VbNXVyC0paSR/hcwpgCq1lhP4BDr97zZW4E/6n2kyVx3S vAKbWcZ5kYjTul6xq95ymuMoUVPepgnlup+0xTKGn/bYvjHZChaVdCtA+nSm8fCsBXIp cpQw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.235.83 with SMTP id kf19mr3690725icb.41.1430601711957; Sat, 02 May 2015 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CV91x.402510$zE7.111881@fx40.am4>
References: <87k2wtvbx1.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <slrnmk4nmp.apd.jon+usenet@frosty.unequivocal.co.uk> <mailman.136.1430414427.3680.python-list@python.org> <W061x.692563$396.195269@fx12.am4> <mailman.12.1430581268.12865.python-list@python.org> <_M61x.477467$Ek.357048@fx07.am4> <mailman.15.1430584786.12865.python-list@python.org> <bN81x.386497$G53.218869@fx13.am4> <mailman.23.1430594149.12865.python-list@python.org> <CV91x.402510$zE7.111881@fx40.am4>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 17:21:51 -0400
Subject: Re: l = range(int(1E9))
From: Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com>
Cc: "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.28.1430601720.12865.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 21
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1430601720 news.xs4all.nl 2875 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40982
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:89799

>> I give up.
>
>
> So do I, I think, if no-one is willing to admit that the original way of
> implementing range() was a glaring mistake.
>
>
> --
> Bartc
>
It doesn't matter for small ranges.  Anyway it was fixed.
>
>
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list



-- 
Joel Goldstick
http://joelgoldstick.com