Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.119 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.76; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'fashion.': 0.07; 'machines.': 0.09; 'reason?': 0.09; 'linux': 0.11; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; '*only*': 0.16; 'ball': 0.16; 'browsers.': 0.16; 'data...': 0.16; 'installed,': 0.16; 'it...': 0.16; 'measured': 0.16; 'subject:versus': 0.16; 'with?': 0.16; '\xa0this': 0.16; 'subject:] ': 0.16; 'versions': 0.18; 'foss': 0.19; 'otherwise,': 0.20; 'tue,': 0.20; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; 'usage': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cheers,': 0.20; 'not.': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.22; 'windows': 0.26; 'there.': 0.26; "i'm": 0.26; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'installed': 0.29; 'loaded': 0.29; 'nobody': 0.29; 'bound': 0.29; 'consistently': 0.29; 'likes': 0.29; 'all.': 0.30; 'least': 0.30; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.31; 'flat': 0.31; 'received:209.85.210.46': 0.31; 'received:mail- pz0-f46.google.com': 0.31; 'data,': 0.31; 'determine': 0.31; 'all,': 0.31; '...': 0.32; "i've": 0.33; 'break': 0.33; 'several': 0.33; 'options': 0.34; 'using': 0.34; 'actually': 0.34; 'light': 0.35; 'requires': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'point': 0.35; 'accurate': 0.35; 'subject:software': 0.35; 'websites,': 0.35; 'running': 0.36; 'allow': 0.36; 'systems,': 0.36; 'platform': 0.36; 'report': 0.37; 'data': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'accuracy': 0.38; 'apr': 0.38; 'hardware': 0.38; 'logging': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'platforms': 0.38; 'software': 0.38; 'used': 0.38; 'machines': 0.39; 'purchased': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'would': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'necessarily': 0.40; '!!!': 0.60; 'convenience.': 0.60; '2011': 0.62; 'free': 0.62; 'wide': 0.63; 'lower': 0.63; 'market': 0.63; 'cost': 0.63; 'person.': 0.64; 'ever': 0.65; 'perfectly': 0.65; 'here': 0.65; 'day': 0.66; 'believe': 0.66; 'show': 0.67; 'share': 0.67; 'sales': 0.69; 'thousands': 0.69; 'subject:Free': 0.72; 'market.': 0.74; 'investment': 0.77; 'census': 0.84; 'dead.': 0.84; 'dodging': 0.84; 'everything,': 0.84; 'license,': 0.84; 'measuring': 0.84; 'to:addr:charter.net': 0.84; 'activated': 0.91; 'here...': 0.91; 'running,': 0.91; 'browsers': 0.93; 'ranging': 0.95; 'absolutely': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tgv6DnjJDLB1Xcv0bkbn3ENiTP3KDGfolR+XOxXw/hA=; b=ECHDhemG83kSxperQ3YyVCJ2HfIvX/OFnDRP+VfS/gZDQ4DYlAi3qsuVHh27PCypXK z/iWJXgZfgdkz7CTS1CpOC4wCY0yYjJzlvemIbTemmnTiqv2pq3zqT9+VxrGvp2YkNk5 XwgB7Pmkw1ZPjToaAqW+zOA0lx4sFIQlWLIPU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jxROjYUtD2cZvIHhpXZtZMHZsXrClgeYRyUn05+zus/dGj5E9+TdOnL0aspkZ2K2nc V6sVDy1wFITdG1i0Bwu1GV941RHUWNDy+sQDr8A2FqO5T+/Aob+YAi3pfa7glcDcIARa ONbRyzuK2faQDCXNV00zAE6WlozyVbiY6+7tY= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4d9c5ca5$0$29991$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87tyebf3r3.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au> <4d9d6a4a$0$29992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <6Nknp.10080$lx3.7480@newsfe02.iad> <4d9e6551$0$29991$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4da0f1e1$0$29986$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> From: Ian Kelly Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:37:08 -0600 Subject: Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents To: harrismh777 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 66 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1302637061 news.xs4all.nl 41110 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:37423 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3081 On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:22 AM, harrismh777 wrot= e: > =A0 =A0This is very difficult... and I'm not dodging the ball here... its= just > the truth. The 'market share' data are bogus. Reason? ... because the fre= e > software 'market' is not a market. This is just word-play. It has no bearing on the accuracy of the data, because the data are not necessarily based on sales. > It is not measured in any way, and it is almost impossible to determine t= herefore in any accurate fashion. There > really are no data... what we need here is a census of sorts. There is at least one method of measuring it without resorting to sales figures: logging user-agent data from web browsers. Is it perfectly accurate? Of course not. But there are a number of different organizations that do this, sampling hundreds of thousands of different websites, and they consistently report that the various versions of Windows have a total usage share ranging from 80% to 90%. That at least gives us an upper and lower bound with a great deal of confidence. In the same data, Apple systems range from about 7% to 15%, and Linux musters a meager 1% to 3%. > =A0 =A0IE is dead. It is flat dead... almost nobody is using it... > > =A0 =A0The market data are worthless in this discussion, because free sof= tware > and free software platforms are not measured in the 'market'. Did you actually look at the links I provided you with? FOSS browsers are absolutely represented there. Again, that data is not based on sales! It is based on user-agent logging. > Please allow > me one more anecdote... I have purchased several machines over the last t= en > years... all of them preloaded with Windows (something) and all of them > running IE (something). =A0NONE of those machines ever saw the light of d= ay as > "Windows" machines. I purchased the hardware *only* recovered my cost on = the > M$ license, and quickly loaded my linux system of choice... and I've used > them all, believe me. > =A0 =A0The point here is that the 'market' data would show that my machin= es were > purchased, installed, and running... activated even. Wrong! The data that I am talking about would report those as Linux systems, provided that you use them for web-browsing. Otherwise, it would not report them at all. > ... just eggs and ham... =A0 =A0Give me a break !!! =A0 I don't even know= one > person who has Win7 installed, running, and likes it... not even one. I have it installed and running, and I like it for what it is. An easy-to-use platform with a wide range of software options that requires little time investment from me for installation, configuration, and maintenance. I would not and do not use it for everything, but I am able to appreciate the convenience. So now you can say that you know one person. Cheers, Ian