Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!uio.no!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.165 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.68; '*S*': 0.01; 'cpython': 0.05; 'windows': 0.15; 'incorrect': 0.16; 'irks': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'paul': 0.24; 'least': 0.26; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'words': 0.29; 'errors': 0.30; 'received:10.0.0': 0.31; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'received:10.0': 0.36; 'example,': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'message- id:@gmail.com': 0.38; 'same.': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'hear': 0.63; 'such': 0.63; 'day.': 0.63; 'smith': 0.68; 'sound': 0.68; 'caused': 0.69; 'freebsd': 0.84; 'mistake': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zvaCniUl81qft425/YKemm2otQwtCFbTp0a/syYU9Us=; b=gzkwns4cd2mZdYBulF6aU7dfMwOcugN+Gqh+XawBftdpSDsDosWWe/TxoUXOPxONs0 nstWwpzmvY6WFqAugUPPCe02fVvFy2Odx8R9CI9e7ViFiS0VxAxs3WobeapsNjj3ViQ0 DSSKIwDgkFPggB2zUE/6rwQbeoIxYlSwALJ8gKFWIFlsyY6mmZ0lZGWTiARskzLnV7oF 1ONDR0qct29og8+fhVhVzWjmdFAWSTpVPpBMFIJu6KDXCHt966LpFhTDDV002AKNj8bg EchqIW5YS/GBc/uOF9liMsI43kL26OKixkbP06YmTTV2dLgJTqwWK+/M549DCRfia5mp Kong== X-Received: by 10.50.26.98 with SMTP id k2mr9296504igg.19.1384659866387; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:44:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 21:44:26 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: grammar (was Re: Automation) References: <5285c2c6$0$29975$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87r4ai6s1l.fsf@rudin.co.uk> <1384621354.2758.238.camel@homebase> In-Reply-To: <1384621354.2758.238.camel@homebase> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 10 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1384659876 news.xs4all.nl 15914 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49361 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:59686 On 2013.11.16 11:02, Paul Smith wrote: > The one that really irks me is people using "loose" when they mean > "lose". These words are not related, and they don't sound the same. > Plus this mistake is very common; I typically see it at least once a > day. Don't be surprised if such people pronounce them the same; a lot of such errors are caused by learning incorrect pronunciation. For example, people often write 'should of' because that is what they hear (and what they end up saying). -- CPython 3.3.2 | Windows NT 6.2.9200 / FreeBSD 10.0