Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.044 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.00; 'regression': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'cases': 0.15; '3.2.': 0.16; 'mardi': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; '3.2': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'patch': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'workaround': 0.29; 'yes.': 0.29; 'case,': 0.29; 'progress': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'wrong': 0.34; 'board': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'be.': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'received:209.85.216': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'performance': 0.39; 'from:no real name:2**0': 0.60; 'solve': 0.62; 'results': 0.65; 'subject:get': 0.81; '3.4': 0.84; 'received:209.85.216.184': 0.84 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.78.131.82; posting-account=ung4FAoAAAC46zhHJ0Nsnuox7M5gDvs_ References: <1a8e1d4b-dddc-48c6-aec8-8041bb559a30@u4g2000pbo.googlegroups.com> <177aa300-9863-44f3-94da-7bc11bff2eda@i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com> <7fdadf96-2ec2-43c7-a5e2-74228c06faca@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 83.78.131.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: get each pair from a string. From: wxjmfauth@gmail.com To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Python X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1351071141 news.xs4all.nl 6884 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37368 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:32024 Le mardi 23 octobre 2012 18:41:45 UTC+2, Ian a =E9crit=A0: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:47 AM, wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > In any case, have you been following the progress of issue 16061? >=20 > There is a patch for the str.replace regression that you identified, >=20 > which results in better performance across the board than 3.2. So >=20 > although 3.3 is slower than 3.2 on this one microbenchmark, 3.4 will >=20 > not be. Yes. A workaround to solve one of the corner cases of something which is wrong by design. jmf