Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.011 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'backwards': 0.07; 'counting': 0.09; 'none:': 0.09; 'substring': 0.09; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'slicing': 0.16; 'string:': 0.16; 'subject:stop': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'meant': 0.17; "wouldn't": 0.17; 'subject:problem': 0.19; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'though.': 0.23; 'pm,': 0.24; 'starts': 0.24; 'variable': 0.24; 'aug': 0.24; 'code': 0.25; 'string': 0.26; 'loop': 0.28; 'sat,': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'calculated': 0.30; 'there': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'right,': 0.34; 'setting': 0.34; 'explicit': 0.34; 'rather': 0.35; 'issue': 0.36; 'example,': 0.37; 'none': 0.37; 'bother': 0.37; 'skip:i 30': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'ways': 0.39; 'else': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; "it's": 0.40; 'reverse': 0.73; 'subject:value': 0.84; 'ugly,': 0.84; 'original.': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=oLN8hMITf0y3124YOMZVvoDDXnMxfxalyYxPCRqqvaY=; b=i6QyrPQ7WqVt0uxFA2qeGrrl1vqyLK/3zKnweuC7hUnxtGw6Y38mHCGn9geea/OfhV 0CSKKTGJgXwQIleLVwX3EgMqDL/peQ7p9azD2J130feFzWAp0aZDbNU1YmdprqBCa0Jz TnHfAffQWuhNHmA1hKHBNwdcvpo8Pt/CpuYBo= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9c3643a8-ba91-4b0b-8144-f4a6260d6cf0@j14g2000prh.googlegroups.com> References: <9c3643a8-ba91-4b0b-8144-f4a6260d6cf0@j14g2000prh.googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:53:53 +0100 Subject: Re: extended slicing and negative stop value problem From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 30 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1313870035 news.xs4all.nl 23851 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35611 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:11928 On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Max wrote: > That doesn't work if it's set in a loop or if it's calculated as a > formula. For example, this very simple code doesn't work because of > the "-1 problem". > Right, which is what I meant by setting it to an explicit None: if input[starting_pos:ending_pos+1] == input[ending_pos : starting_pos-1 if starting_pos >= 0 else None : -1]: You're right that it starts to get ugly, though. Of course, there are other ways to find the longest palindromic substring in a string: # I wouldn't bother counting a one-character "palindrome" for substr_length in range(len(input),1,-1): for starting_pos in range(len(input)-substr_length+1): ending_pos = starting_pos + substr_length - 1 testme = input[starting_pos:ending_pos+1] if testme == testme[::-1]: print(testme) exit(0) That is, snip out the string and then reverse that snipped piece, rather than reverse-slicing from the original. This doesn't solve the issue of slicing backwards with variable halts, though. ChrisA