Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'python,': 0.02; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'startup': 0.05; 'builtin': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'commonly': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subset': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; 'java,': 0.15; 'commercially': 0.16; 'fits': 0.16; 'message- id:@dough.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'certainly': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'mostly': 0.20; 'written': 0.20; 'trying': 0.21; 'runs': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'compiled': 0.27; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'coded': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'classes': 0.30; 'subject: ?': 0.30; 'generally': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'languages': 0.33; 'done': 0.34; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'modules': 0.36; 'uses': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'application': 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'first': 0.61; 'youtube': 0.62; 'ever': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'believe': 0.69; 'direct': 0.69; '1990s,': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'subject:proposition': 0.84; 'kat': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: Is Python a commercial proposition ? Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:38:50 -0400 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-75-251-66.phlapa.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1343590753 news.xs4all.nl 6946 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57735 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:26210 On 7/29/2012 12:01 PM, lipska the kat wrote: > I'm trying to understand where Python fits into the set of commonly > available, commercially used languages of the moment. Ever heard of a little startup called Google? It was built with C, Java, ... and Python. I believe Youtube is scripted in Python. > Are applications generally written entirely in python > or is it more often used for a subset of functionality. Even if the direct application is in Python, if it runs on CPython, it probably uses modules coded or re-coded in C, and it certainly used builtin functions and classes coded in C. The first 'killer app' for Python, in the 1990s, was its use as a glue language for interactive and batch scientific/numerical computation mostly done in compiled Fortran. -- Terry Jan Reedy