Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.022 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'definitions': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; 'literal': 0.09; 'pointless': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'wrong,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'cares': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:comment': 0.16; 'subject:quoted': 0.16; 'subject:simple': 0.16; 'subject:triple': 0.16; 'such,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'affects': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'sort': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'programming.': 0.30; 'statement': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'alone': 0.33; 'fri,': 0.33; 'actual': 0.34; "i'd": 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'pm,': 0.38; 'either': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'expression': 0.60; 'reach': 0.63; 'subject:. ': 0.67; 'side': 0.67; 'between': 0.67; 'close': 0.67; 'debate': 0.68; 'nobody': 0.68; 'useful.': 0.68; '2015': 0.84; 'disagreement': 0.84; 'ian,': 0.84; "it'd": 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=L66j1n2LqjC4UtRfEUj4VFAav9MVOWdWymZTsAZkVTU=; b=sgojOgQQgrGGGMaNih6fGgmJl0SKFoAwdAUyF5ku6FYnd28gZUweNdTplByL509nAa f3zD4sIboqBAssiituWlz3PrvW5Qcf/z2vpFr92/QOaUk7Dlf23p3/cMmQnTsiUUl66S I1AjQvAWceDClpYOtVdyLtfYT1Cej31oUR7nc4UtCqwouKg23AnNPNrYwcA1rLsxrdAd 8l/6Il80XdwlzXmrvNyzKeq1DbUOm5/0t2IXeFkaJuFfvuB7ohnb/G1gTa0A7LA+XPSi q12og+RmWb9zVOQFyqJNbmppWwfkbGpytqy5vVXTLtTI/ejKqzQMUY+pkzbonEuHQ6BC 8quQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.16.87 with SMTP id y84mr1374306ioi.53.1428040678061; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 22:57:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <551e27c5$0$12904$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> References: <3533816.ZYnZ2OzjCs@PointedEars.de> <3971951.908YQu3oQO@PointedEars.de> <1504323.jUKfeKbQsP@PointedEars.de> <2362875.FIK8ImHTJA@PointedEars.de> <1823599.Pr2V0MPR6q@PointedEars.de> <9781856.5cutuNVPEq@PointedEars.de> <3894022.plrvF2nHWu@PointedEars.de> <1905422.ubGH1B8UfE@PointedEars.de> <551e27c5$0$12904$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:57:57 +1100 Subject: Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1428040681 news.xs4all.nl 2898 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37568 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:88471 On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > This sterile, pointless arguing about the minutia of pedantic definitions is > not even close to useful. Honestly Thomas, Ian, nobody cares any more. If I > were a betting man, I'd bet that neither of you can describe, in one > sentence, what is the actual disagreement between the two of you, let alone > why it matters for Python programming. I know that it started in response to my statement that string literal concatenation wasn't an expression as such, but I have no idea what either side of the current debate is, nor how it affects my statement's validity. I _had_ hoped it would reach some sort of conclusion - I may be right, I may be wrong, but it'd be nice to know which. So far... no idea. ChrisA