Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: empty clause of for loops
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:01:59 +0100
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <mailman.269.1458216120.12893.python-list@python.org>
References: <56E93413.6090108@mail.de> <ncbdk4$h9u$1@ger.gmane.org> <56E94EB9.9050507@mail.de> <ncbl8p$hq6$1@ger.gmane.org> <56E96DDA.30008@mail.de> <20160316100229.0ce28992@bigbox.christie.dr> <56E978FD.6070502@mail.de> <1458146254.105444.551062074.52B32ACC@webmail.messagingengine.com> <56E9902F.9080103@mail.de> <56E99159.70501@mail.de> <1458148134.113764.551096586.28A85FDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <mailman.237.1458151523.12893.python-list@python.org> <56e9fa05$0$22141$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de a8eY4hN/TDZavBLz2wCIJgGAe7GElTmlB7XvHt5IxatQ==
Return-Path: <srkunze@mail.de>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.015
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'chunk': 0.07; 'clause': 0.07; 'data:': 0.07; 'executed': 0.07; '(actually': 0.09; 'exception,': 0.09; '"not"': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'return,': 0.16; 'skips': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'dropped': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.24; 'error': 0.27; 'fine': 0.28; 'raise': 0.29; 'code': 0.30; 'post': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'jump': 0.33; 'raising': 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'true.': 0.33; 'received:10.0': 0.34; 'best,': 0.35; 'could': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'needed': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'thought': 0.37; 'several': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; "didn't": 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'back': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'introduction': 0.63; 'realise': 0.66; 'results': 0.66; 'finally': 0.70; 'heavy': 0.81; "'if": 0.84; 'break.': 0.84
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mail.de; s=mail201212; t=1458216118; bh=o6VIaYqQsRqGv1lp7JDcObZHpzL3LWnctY+v59j4VJA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=bqL5WMZo2HaF0PqTd46wwhWGKDi4WsKtUfEX9QGU6H/s/w8qoIzRenlGiOQnHRrTg n5FFvNvVuByQ8lzahlVU6UN6NyIWuN2mGGmEG4dwaQv6SeA9a1HuJG7vPNIs2EVlX6 xuY+r2NTEJGcspUgBXHo16YWmRzzyF1FuapHlgQ0=
In-Reply-To: <56e9fa05$0$22141$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate-size: 1374
X-purgate-ID: 154282::1458216118-000009F3-76E8EFFB/0/0
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:105087

On 17.03.2016 01:27, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> That post describes the motivating use-case for the introduction
> of "if...else", and why break skips the "else" clause:
>
>
> for x in data:
>      if meets_condition(x):
>          break
> else:
>      # raise error or do additional processing
>
>
> It might help to realise that the "else" clause is misnamed. It should be
> called "then":
>
> for x in data:
>      block
> then:
>      block
>
>
> The "then" (actually "else") block is executed *after* the for-loop, unless
> you jump out of that chunk of code by raising an exception, calling return,
> or break.
>
> As a beginner, it took me years of misunderstanding before I finally
> understood for...else and while...else, because I kept coming back to the
> thought that the else block was executed if the for/while block *didn't*
> execute.

That's true. I needed to explain this to few people and I always need 
several attempts/starts to get it right in a simple statement:

'If you do a "break", then "else" is NOT executed.' I think the "NOT" 
results in heavy mental lifting.

> I couldn't get code with for...else to work right and I didn't
> understand why until finally the penny dropped and realised that "else"
> should be called "then".

That's actually a fine idea. One could even say: "finally".

Best,
Sven