Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.051 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'wed,': 0.03; 'typed': 0.07; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'angelico': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'three.': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.17; 'received:74.125.82.44': 0.19; 'received:mail-ww0-f44.google.com': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'cc:2**0': 0.22; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.23; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'fact': 0.30; 'chris': 0.34; 'using': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'keyboard': 0.37; 'received:74.125.82': 0.38; 'received:74.125': 0.38; 'could': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'url:co': 0.62; 'law': 0.62; 'designed': 0.65; 'verified': 0.73; 'demo': 0.77; 'subject:Improve': 0.84; 'father': 0.95 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m6KuWCBfqWIruDPFInOqyUqvR93wwgFaEMGgOn11lmA=; b=rym00mz1RSrCN04sVxtHFfPmnYb/Rev0mZ5kb/FPQKnCSjRPJVBmy4gP5/0jsJZVF0 GH4koOHmbSeeF6iufOzgwPxTUsdVtt2kAmStIXGLDCHw2HQM2GV1eOgSXo90/awHNokE XeavhvWxHEVp3369QYcZNh2qxeLBu9ETh2tiI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=W5k0qqwLdFEBtMjXK1Z2W7Y05cvAp3/x/uK0kifMZ3S1ztj6jkmG0gqPotueYOp5CJ Vk8dtT5uiMNeKghqmENNyPhTl5GJNXGsspjtxK5sdegidi7BJh/R5/QVCDGh2kA9zQdB vmiST2lBSlcZNVyA2zBkFuxdNYHRUQxRhOCcg= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <355e201c-437c-4944-9ad0-ae401df02651@22g2000prx.googlegroups.com> <4f4bv6hn40jsgpecuelejc66n7rkhv17fj@4ax.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:22:15 +0300 Subject: Re: Keyboard Layout: Dvorak vs Colemak: is it Worthwhile to Improve the Dvorak Layout? From: Dotan Cohen To: Chris Angelico Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1308129738 news.xs4all.nl 49038 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:42063 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:7682 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > Competing rumour: The layout was designed such that "typewriter" could > be typed out using only the top row, to improve demo speed by a factor > of three. > Utter nonsense. The QWERTY keyboard was - and this is verified fact - designed the way is was because the inventor's mother in law's initials were AS and his father is law was DF. The letter combinations JK and L; were his childrens' initials. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com