Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'argument': 0.04; 'context': 0.05; 'none:': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; 'languages.': 0.15; 'message-id:@dough.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:import': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'code.': 0.20; 'posted': 0.22; 'statement': 0.23; 'idea': 0.24; 'pass': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; '---': 0.26; 'wrote': 0.26; 'see,': 0.27; 'thoughts': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; "i'm": 0.29; 'function': 0.30; 'url:python': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'pm,': 0.35; 'similar': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'rather': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'nothing': 0.38; 'science': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'john': 0.60; 'here:': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'eight': 0.71; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'url:lang': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: from future import pass_function Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:21:56 -0400 References: <5571fa66-edf7-4fb4-8ae4-87ad70c32abc@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-75-251-66.phlapa.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 In-Reply-To: <5571fa66-edf7-4fb4-8ae4-87ad70c32abc@googlegroups.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 27 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1343362953 news.xs4all.nl 6884 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33433 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:26132 On 7/26/2012 4:48 PM, John Ladasky wrote: > I had very similar thoughts about eight months ago, and posted them > here: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/comp.lang.python/CB_5fek2b8A > > I'm no computer science guru, but the idea that pass should be a > function rather than a statement continues to appeal to me. A do nothing statement is standard in statement based languages. It is not going away. > can see, I actually wrote just such a function so that I could use it > as an argument in my code. For one time use: lambda:None For multiple use: def none: pass # same as return None in this context A function needs a lot more meat than that to be added as a builtin. --- Terry Jan Reedy