Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'example:': 0.03; 'instance,': 0.05; 'function,': 0.07; 'wrapper': 0.07; 'attribute.': 0.09; 'decorator': 0.09; 'func': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'def': 0.14; '*args,': 0.16; 'args[0]': 0.16; 'received:washington.edu': 0.16; 'res': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'ugly.': 0.16; 'unbound': 0.16; 'variable.': 0.16; 'subject:question': 0.17; 'instance': 0.18; 'trying': 0.21; 'thus': 0.23; 'works.': 0.23; "i'm": 0.26; 'tried': 0.28; 'bound': 0.28; 'work:': 0.28; 'second': 0.29; 'class': 0.29; 'disappointed': 0.30; 'pretty': 0.32; "can't": 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.33; '(for': 0.35; 'but': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'called': 0.38; 'case': 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'skip:_ 10': 0.40; 'did': 0.40; 'results': 0.61; 'subject:but': 0.67; 'works,': 0.68; 'subject:class': 0.84; 'timings': 0.84; 'russell': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: "Russell E. Owen" Subject: Decorator question: prefer class, but only function works Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:52:17 -0800 Organization: University of Washington X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: b172-28-191-0.nat.washington.edu User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 40 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1320962112 news.xs4all.nl 6962 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48543 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:15564 I am trying to write a decorator that times an instance method and writes the results to a class member variable. For example: def timeMethod(func): def wrapper(self, *args, **keyArgs): t1 = time.time() res = func(self, *args, **keyArgs) duration = time.time() - t1 self.timings[func.__name__] = duration return res return wrapper This works, but I'm not very happy with the way self.timings is obtained. I first tried to write this as a class (for readability), and this did NOT work: class timeMethod(object): def __init__(self, func): self.func = func def __call__(self, *args, **keyArgs): t1 = time.time() res = self.func(*args, **keyArgs) duration = time.time() - t1 args[0].timings.set(self.func.__name__, duration) return res In the first case the wrapper is called as an unbound function, so it works. But in the second case the wrapper is called as a bound method -- thus args[0] is not func's class instance, and I can't get to the timings attribute. Unfortunately they are both pretty ugly. Is there a cleaner way to access the the instance of which func is a member? I was very disappointed it was not available when timeMethod was called/instantiated. -- Russell