Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.029 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'wed,': 0.03; 'typed': 0.07; 'oh,': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.10; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.14; 'received:mail-iw0-f174.google.com': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'bieber': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'three.': 0.16; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'referring': 0.23; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'received:209.85.214': 0.28; 'lee': 0.29; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'blocks': 0.30; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'there': 0.35; 'skip:" 10': 0.35; 'using': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'could': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'under': 0.40; 'more': 0.60; 'designed': 0.65; 'demo': 0.77; 'dennis': 0.77; 'belief,': 0.84; 'roberts': 0.84; 'strokes': 0.84; 'subject:Improve': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I3xwy/6rq3teABNbvDfvHJpW1O+csVfGgWhKqNbOJGo=; b=cKmWuMuYJFWKbXRIGAtiF7A0hkr1W74bi5tTBfYs48GBWmqKMZ81hFP73JOxVUXvTM u88O2buxmoWpK/dXtaBQR5Fu6BxNDrph8yJl/jL81syr5/3GQzmJJ750pVSvHg0UDk2t EH2LSR4V/pLuymgDyxobCBrZ73X1rC1HJpmFI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=INC5wUd1vxgp414IQ7mxdQ+J0y3t2dubiY/aL/3QmTXbGZIGGxwYeVxjZTCjeB4MkS Ba6ls0ZFBubjJk497PUeKwOQvpagzLHgOmXNESb88pbKTc1N//LKlSvYWcF5hG0ECHSt vSVvE3djW/q1sL0ip/6klcafd07hVcSCDJLv8= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <355e201c-437c-4944-9ad0-ae401df02651@22g2000prx.googlegroups.com> <4f4bv6hn40jsgpecuelejc66n7rkhv17fj@4ax.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:30:13 +1000 Subject: Re: Keyboard Layout: Dvorak vs Colemak: is it Worthwhile to Improve the Dvorak Layout? From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1308126617 news.xs4all.nl 49182 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:37846 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:7679 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Tim Roberts wrote: > Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Oh, there was an "inefficiency" in QWERTY -- but it only app= lies to >>fully manual typewriters, in which some of the more common letters were >>placed under the weakest fingers -- to slow down key strokes enough to >>reduce jamming multiple type blocks > > That's what I was referring to. =A0That's a very common belief, but it's > nonsense. Competing rumour: The layout was designed such that "typewriter" could be typed out using only the top row, to improve demo speed by a factor of three. ChrisA