Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.101 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.80; '*S*': 0.00; 'python': 0.11; 'language.': 0.14; 'determines': 0.16; 'frankly': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'subject:problem': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'waste': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'though.': 0.31; 'quite': 0.32; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'case,': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'wrong': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'subject:"': 0.60; 'valuable': 0.63; 'subject:The': 0.64; 'talking': 0.65; 'precious': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=I0B62UAOdNaQ2fS0rP5NwDKMzDmKZb98LHR0/c/99N8=; b=Vo2QNJUz/4xkv/+p+sIxLf5yJw4UuXHmarK3uB1zUYGac98x1nhxX7wzaYyUhxkkQ/ MPQfb/a3CZQBSFELerfqpkkp/njhXaaExocYLCgBeNCdVh7MaFsnVHUA8oCL8kSlwIlo U4Qt8ngtaVXUaXER+JulQP8NDaulX0VHK6rlO7x+m8lIWg3CRUbdlSGwNI6PrmLkvQ6C sd1fCUyyIqym1NMDAwqYhyrEzuchBpl3v5I8HbgaKgR1LUiGPqgZL/3//CRCtzn2Ub7R XoASf7Me1XbTkjLNVpD8aqJPzjVP0NYQ37/ASRPUSNQOEb3JkyYbbPoKaGmqpXiaFNf7 rk5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.106.74 with SMTP id w10mr17610395vco.32.1370292251801; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:44:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51acfd28$0$29966$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> References: <687dea63-84da-4c45-9366-cb5a10665d1f@googlegroups.com> <51acfd28$0$29966$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 06:44:11 +1000 Subject: Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 12 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1370292689 news.xs4all.nl 15937 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41244 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:46809 On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > ... quite frankly I have no sympathy for > the view that CPU cycles are so precious that we mustn't waste them. If > that were the case, Python is the wrong language. CPU cycles *are* valuable still, though. The efficiency of your code determines how well it scales - but we have to be talking 100tps vs 1000tps here. There needs to be a huge difference for it to be at all significant. ChrisA