Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Ethan Furman Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:20:17 -0700 Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <7046c74e-e5ea-4dde-8847-8c556756a563@googlegroups.com> <5789B601.9000604@stoneleaf.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de UF+8PAQdxCChKJYXjYhoEwfbotDn/phDpw71RsBfwC5Q== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.008 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'bool': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'boolean': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:Singleton': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; "python's": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; '~ethan~': 0.29; 'especially': 0.32; 'gets': 0.35; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; '\xe2\x80\x93': 0.72; 'notion': 0.91 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: <7046c74e-e5ea-4dde-8847-8c556756a563@googlegroups.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <5789B601.9000604@stoneleaf.us> X-Mailman-Original-References: <7046c74e-e5ea-4dde-8847-8c556756a563@googlegroups.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:111491 On 07/15/2016 09:04 PM, Rustom Mody wrote: > Just that suggesting that python's bool notion is straightforward is an > unnecessary lie – especially to newbies. Python's boolean concept is as simple as it gets -- what is not straightforward about it? -- ~Ethan~