Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Maier Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: non printable (moving away from Perl) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:34:14 +0100 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de Wm9G07cEmI5DY4gbYnh11wBXyoRSQ1FZu3bN1Pnr+sgA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'lines,': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'second.': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'am,': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'finished': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'perl': 0.29; 'received:132': 0.29; 'file': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'things': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'subject:from': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.230.194.216 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:104623 On 11.03.2016 15:23, Fillmore wrote: > On 03/11/2016 07:13 AM, Wolfgang Maier wrote: >> One lesson for Perl regex users is that in Python many things can be >> solved without regexes. >> How about defining: >> >> printable = {chr(n) for n in range(32, 127)} >> >> then using: >> >> if (set(my_string) - set(printable)): >> break > > seems computationally heavy. I have a file with about 70k lines, of > which only 20 contain "funny" chars. > Not sure what you call computationally heavy. I just test-parsed a 30 MB file (28k lines) with: with open(my_file) as i: for line in i: if set(line) - printable: continue and it finished in less than a second.