Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.037 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'dan': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'psf': 0.10; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'portion': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'subject:problem': 0.24; 'least': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'code': 0.31; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'tool': 0.35; 'no,': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'wrong': 0.37; 'jason': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'subject:"': 0.60; 'no.': 0.61; 'our': 0.64; 'subject:The': 0.64; 'carrier': 0.68; ':).': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Robert Kern Subject: Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:52:14 +0100 References: <687dea63-84da-4c45-9366-cb5a10665d1f@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.1.240.226 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1370256748 news.xs4all.nl 15871 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39765 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:46784 On 2013-06-03 05:20, Dan Sommers wrote: > On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 23:23:42 -0400, Jason Swails wrote: >> ... (And yes, a good portion of our code is -still- in Fortran -- but >> at least it's F90+ :). > > I am a huge proponent of using the right tool for the job. There is > nothing wrong with some well-placed FORTRAN, as long as the PSF No, no. It's the PSU that you have to worrNO CARRIER