Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Mark Lawrence Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Suggestion: make sequence and map interfaces more similar Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:17:21 +0100 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <56fb677f$0$11121$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <56fba7d3$0$1616$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <56fbc518$0$1593$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <56fbf73d$0$1591$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <56fc8e09$0$1600$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <56fcfdc6$0$1612$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <56FD086F.2090301@rece.vub.ac.be> <56FD2158.2050406@rece.vub.ac.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de TyO0Vg2xrotMYesHpyCZdAdngOSYL/CfDllH7hj51oxQ== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.030 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; 'mess': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'thread': 0.10; 'python': 0.10; 'accordingly.': 0.13; 'argument': 0.15; 'discuss.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:interfaces': 0.16; 'subject:make': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'language': 0.19; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'position:': 0.22; 'slightly': 0.23; 'examples': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'example': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; 'far,': 0.29; 'knows': 0.32; 'language.': 0.32; "i'll": 0.33; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'instead': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; '(and': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'beyond': 0.37; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'subject:more': 0.61; 'real': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'strange': 0.63; 'personal': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'request.': 0.66; 'judge': 0.66; 'worth': 0.67; 'act': 0.67; 'yourself': 0.73; 'angelico:': 0.84; 'beats': 0.84; 'pardon': 0.84; 'pythonistas,': 0.84; 'schreef': 0.84; 'toy': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.234.189.93 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 In-Reply-To: <56FD2158.2050406@rece.vub.ac.be> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:106156 On 31/03/2016 14:08, Antoon Pardon wrote: > Op 31-03-16 om 13:57 schreef Chris Angelico: >> Okay. I'll put a slightly different position: Prove that your proposal >> is worth discussing by actually giving us an example that we can >> discuss. So far, this thread has had nothing but toy examples (and >> bogoexamples that prove nothing beyond that the author knows how to >> mess with Python - fun, but not a strong argument on either side). >> Give us some real meat to work with, instead of these drips of >> tantalizing blood. > > What a strange request. Whether or not something is worth discussing > is a personal judgement. So there can be no proof of such a thing. > I would say: judge for yourself and act accordingly. > Drivel. This is comp.lang.python, where "Practicality beats purity" every time, not comp.theoretical.claptrap. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence