Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <jjposner@optimum.net>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.018
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; '*not*': 0.05; ':-)': 0.06; 'header:In-reply-to:1': 0.09; 'received:167.206.4': 0.16; 'received:cv.net': 0.16; 'received:hcvlny.cv.net': 0.16; 'received:srv.hcvlny.cv.net': 0.16; 'subject:() ': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'to:2**1': 0.19; 'maybe': 0.21; 'code': 0.25; 'project,': 0.27; 'to:name:python-list': 0.28; "it'd": 0.30; 'really,': 0.30; 'chris': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'pm,': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'actually': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'but': 0.37; 'put': 0.38; 'received:192': 0.38; "it's": 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'our': 0.63; 'benefit': 0.66; 'making': 0.67; 'saw': 0.67; 'production': 0.70
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:51:27 -0500
From: John Posner <jjposner@optimum.net>
Subject: Re: all() is slow?
In-reply-to: <CAPTjJmrSaS5-3Az4f6p62x15B1S5C4PYENxtRjS46rq9=Am-3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>, python-list <python-list@python.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2
References: <Xns9F9684761E3AOKB@88.198.244.100> <436fb6a3-1075-45a6-8f93-5612d050b11a@q35g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <mailman.2522.1320703618.27778.python-list@python.org> <j9b65e$c26$1@speranza.aioe.org> <CAPTjJmrSaS5-3Az4f6p62x15B1S5C4PYENxtRjS46rq9=Am-3Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.2554.1320794497.27778.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 11
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1320794497 news.xs4all.nl 6907 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41742
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:15484

On 2:59 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:

>>> So really, it's not "all() is slow" but "function calls are slow".
>>> Maybe it'd be worthwhile making an all-factory:
>> PLEASE say you're joking. If I saw code like that on any of our project,
>> this would definitely qualify for a DailyWTF.
> For the benefit of anyone who was actually in doubt: YES, I was
> joking. Do *not* put code like this into any production project.

Because an all-factory would produce code smell? :-)