Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.008 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'fails.': 0.09; 'retained': 0.09; 'subject:not': 0.11; 'read.': 0.13; 'sat,': 0.15; 'able,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'iteratively': 0.16; 'limit,': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'instance,': 0.17; 'sort': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'possible,': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'file': 0.32; 'suggestion': 0.32; 'running': 0.32; 'utility': 0.33; 'handle': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'thanks': 0.34; 'too.': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'compare': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'data': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'files': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'days': 0.60; '20,': 0.65; 'subject:available': 0.96 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BU0tfB0jEqkgfq7p1uQvUTu4HHj+xXGkyqOdwW8EFms=; b=Cmk793KDMTmenIcDqpVJhp+DZ4iD9FyLSnTUOOvBTwc+Sbsudx2XQRygpP/mYpt3xd caO5DlN9sRneztDOLcX3ANjOTx6v6Gy1/jbpDYJcq65KxYts7spFLhvsoy/H+ME3SDdg pecMG9ISymNUQav5Y41G+E7Kz94cBsYSZdpPADkVWwFttbdFH44TMxFbndZG/yaEdTBl 8fJcAP5g87fe++Y6Clrr4JRgRo87EENYb/kPQuqwSohtk9okXp/YLHsKG70mwwFqBX9T xcThwjdi1afwqJYaJmDdH3aIbnjj9CjeZwk75640SsgWR5fS8d+Ml5U78AGnYvrZjL42 yZlw== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <76D03718A3233B4C8CC236C169B535B5A23E063F6D@AUSP01VMBX08.collaborationhost.net> References: <76D03718A3233B4C8CC236C169B535B5A23E063E45@AUSP01VMBX08.collaborationhost.net> <9oi388heolcjt1es6em5f9c93q73cranbh@invalid.netcom.com> <76D03718A3233B4C8CC236C169B535B5A23E063F6D@AUSP01VMBX08.collaborationhost.net> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:15:10 +1100 Subject: Re: Python does not take up available physical memory From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1350699319 news.xs4all.nl 6865 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44434 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:31790 On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Pradipto Banerjee wrote: > Dennis, > > 1. Yes, .readlines() work where .read() fails. Thanks for the suggestion - this has really given a big boost to the size of the data I can read. If at all possible, consider reading the file iteratively and retaining only the current line. You say you need to "compare one line versus another" - are you able, for instance, to sort the file (externally; I think every OS these days will have a sort utility that can handle files >RAM) and then compare the current line against a small amount of retained state? This sort (pun intended) of trick can not only get you past the limit, it will often improve running time enormously too. ChrisA