Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.032 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'augmented': 0.09; 'moreover,': 0.09; 'referenced': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'analysing': 0.16; 'dump,': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'pages,': 0.27; 'publicly': 0.29; 'selection': 0.29; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'addressed.': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'data': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'subject:, ': 0.61; 'techniques': 0.63; 'believe': 0.69; 'paper': 0.78; 'subject:skip:S 10': 0.84 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:14:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.193.157.250; posting-account=7dih-AoAAADmwQdSIV_xUDxIuvt-Mg0Q References: <30cde2cd-ee38-4b54-87cc-5c0a79e9f1c6@googlegroups.com> <500DC5BB.8030100@udel.edu> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 84.193.157.250 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow From: Alexander Serebrenik To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 3 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1343081682 news.xs4all.nl 6865 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57081 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:25936 1) The paper referenced contains 4 pages, so it should be available via IEEXplore. Moreover, you can find a copy on http://www.win.tue.nl/~aserebre/MSR2012.pdf 2) Since the survey is only one of the techniques we intend to use, and it will be augmented by analysing the data publicly available in the SE dump, I believe the selection bias is appropriately addressed.