Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.094 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.82; '*S*': 0.01; 'python,': 0.02; 'terry': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'reedy': 0.16; 'relevance': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'donated': 0.17; 'cc:2**1': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'authors': 0.27; 'related': 0.30; 'point': 0.31; 'aside': 0.32; 'list': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'cc:no real name:2**1': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'pdf': 0.37; 'data': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'google': 0.39; 'valuable': 0.60; 'link': 0.60; 'subject:, ': 0.61; 'free': 0.61; 'leaving': 0.62; 'results': 0.65; 'quality': 0.69; 'papers': 0.78; 'subject:skip:S 10': 0.84; 'survey,': 0.93 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:01:33 -0500 From: Evan Driscoll User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow References: <30cde2cd-ee38-4b54-87cc-5c0a79e9f1c6@googlegroups.com> <500DC5BB.8030100@udel.edu> In-Reply-To: <500DC5BB.8030100@udel.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: python-list@python.org, a.serebrenik@tue.nl X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1343080932 news.xs4all.nl 6936 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49807 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:25933 On 01/-10/-28163 01:59 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > This is a deceptive and time-wasting link.... > > Leaving aside the point that this is not directly related to Python, my > opinion is that if the authors will not make past and future papers > freely available, not even an abstract, they should not ask for valuable > free data from freely donated time. Leaving aside questions of relevance to the email list and the quality of results from a self-selected survey, the PDF is linked directly from the Google Scholar link in the original post: "[PDF] from tue.nl". Evan