Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.159 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.68; '*S*': 0.00; 'argument,': 0.09; ':o)': 0.16; 'limit.': 0.16; 'readability.': 0.16; "someone's": 0.16; 'char': 0.17; 'bit': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; "doesn't": 0.28; 'lines': 0.28; 'long.': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; '-----': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'text': 0.34; 'add': 0.36; 'usual': 0.37; 'quite': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mean': 0.38; 'possible.': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'short': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'matter': 0.61; 'received:194': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'limit': 0.65; 'sound': 0.65; 'fact,': 0.69; 'exceeding': 0.84; 'flame': 0.84 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,612,1344204000"; d="scan'208";a="813092" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.sequans.com Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:21:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Jean-Michel Pichavant To: python-list@python.org In-Reply-To: <5080ae0e$0$29985$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Subject: Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.0_GA_2669 (ZimbraWebClient - GC7 (Linux)/7.2.0_GA_2669) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 21 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1350638446 news.xs4all.nl 6904 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57923 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:31725 ----- Original Message ----- [snipe 80 char line discussion] > And, quite frankly, people who care more about the readability of > their > code than about squeezing in as much processing into a single line of > text as possible. > As usual Steven, you take someone's argument, you add a little bit of exaggeration and make it sound silly. Using 80+ char lines doesn't mean I put all my efforts exceeding the 80 char limit. As a matter of fact, I never get the char limit get into the way of readability. What needs to be short will be short, and what needs to be long will be long. [snip] > Flame away :) good job :o) JM