Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'syntax': 0.04; '[1]:': 0.09; '[2]:': 0.09; 'accepted,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'extraneous': 0.16; 'lambda': 0.16; 'parentheses': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'syntaxerror:': 0.16; 'seems': 0.21; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'usually': 0.31; '"",': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'but': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'invalid': 0.68; 'received:139': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Neal Becker Subject: why syntax change in lambda Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:03:49 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: exa2-in-fw-01-epn.hns.com User-Agent: KNode/4.10.5 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 12 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1378904645 news.xs4all.nl 15951 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46371 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:53961 In py2.7 this was accepted, but not in py3.3. Is this intentional? It seems to violate the 'principle' that extraneous parentheses are usually allowed/ignored In [1]: p = lambda x: x In [2]: p = lambda (x): x File "", line 1 p = lambda (x): x ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax