Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.031 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; '22,': 0.09; 'subject:into': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'list)': 0.16; 'map(int,': 0.16; 'reason.': 0.16; 'received:209.85.161.174': 0.16; 'sequence.': 0.16; 'subject:Converting': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'file.': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; "i've": 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'looks': 0.26; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'subject:list': 0.28; "i'm": 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'could': 0.32; 'everyone': 0.33; 'hi,': 0.33; "can't": 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'returning': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'functional': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'option': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'performance': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'help': 0.40; 'more': 0.63; 'jul': 0.65; 'brain,': 0.84; 'clearer': 0.84; 'quicker': 0.84; 'am.': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oebr8Pbwyw665OBD9EikRtiKQpqSrf5lR8hjX7mFsNc=; b=LIEnGaD8TYTzDBbZo476rkNcHlSh+SaLLG2pFWXmOYxouy4OGWVyZBFWwNbVszvlPI 5yNw0EylSLqGz/Ka738Wv9Dc24l8wpDUKkynlBCRApCmHXDfBSuXrzgO6x20egRon31U w5dK/1nCTw7xJsWqhq4e17bLlTEmtV+dD7dGDq9smtwSMYcQXGOGXhCDXo7ylK7l/GUc mATIy3ll5OhiNn4MJXQL968PPeqQkFfNi65Q8sRTBCSbWDs53P6kP0jF0Qv/BweSo4nB BYqr+DRe1xFDUCL3xouL96XvF/Ek49WuYM+g+6+OVpwK/uOVgn8qbu1ZPXvcLxCsKVLC 7M1A== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <500C2842.4040204@freenet.de> References: <3rCdnUCiWpP1gZHNnZ2dnUVZ7vQAAAAA@giganews.com> <500C2842.4040204@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 13:03:10 -0400 Subject: Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? From: David Robinow To: janpeterr@freenet.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1342976600 news.xs4all.nl 6946 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41683 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:25823 On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Jan Riechers wrote: > On 22.07.2012 18:39, Alister wrote: >> looks like a classic list comprehension to me and can be achieved in a >> single line >> MODUS_LIST=[int(x) for x in options.modus_list] > Hi, > > I am not sure why everyone is using the for-iterator option over a "map", > but I would do it like that: > MODUS_LIST= map(int, options.modus_list) > > "map" works on a list and does commandX (here "int" conversion, use "str" > for string.. et cetera) on sequenceY, returning a sequence. More in the help > file. > > And if I'm not completely mistaken, it's also the quicker way to do > performance wise. But I can't completely recall the exact reason. Because if you don't have a functional background 'map' is unfamiliar. Although I've been aware of it for years I still can't remember if it's map(int, list) or map(list,int) and although with a small effort I could force it into my brain, I know that many of the people reading my code are as ignorant as I am. The list comprehension seems clearer to me.