Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'ugly': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'brackets': 0.09; 'compilers.': 0.09; 'dumps': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'wastes': 0.09; '(c#,': 0.16; 'contributors': 0.16; 'ignores': 0.16; 'long-time': 0.16; 'mark,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; "someone's": 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'widely': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'code,': 0.18; 'parse': 0.22; 'required.': 0.22; 'programming': 0.23; 'for?': 0.23; 'statement': 0.23; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'language.': 0.27; 'newer': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'surprised': 0.29; 'words': 0.29; '"the': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'anybody': 0.32; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'impression': 0.33; 'anyone': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'languages': 0.33; 'community': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'really': 0.36; 'except': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'programmers': 0.36; 'visual': 0.36; 'bad': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'rather': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'nothing': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'short': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'most': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'here': 0.65; 'hang': 0.65; 'day': 0.73; 'widespread': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: python-list@python.org
From: Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Python Newbie
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 20:41:16 +0000
References: <cad0eacc-6040-4a00-bd05-7fabfd2fa70e@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2237.1361508661.2939.python-list@python.org> <kg7mfi$8oh$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.2259.1361535166.2939.python-list@python.org> <kg7t19$a63$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA16F92E78A66duncanbooth@127.0.0.1> <5127848B.1060004@gmail.com> <mailman.2271.1361545569.2939.python-list@python.org> <928d2cf7-728b-4f35-b8c9-4c9b958507e5@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2415.1361725791.2939.python-list@python.org> <61471a01-ee6e-4bc6-bd08-8696a31ec1eb@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-92-18-29-221.as13285.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
In-Reply-To: <61471a01-ee6e-4bc6-bd08-8696a31ec1eb@googlegroups.com>
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130224-0, 24/02/2013), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.2432.1361738327.2939.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 31
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1361738327 news.xs4all.nl 6916 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48202
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:39786

On 24/02/2013 19:40, piterrr.dolinski@gmail.com wrote:
>>> if (some statement):		# short form
>>>
>>> rather than
>>>
>>> if (some statement == true):	# long form
>>
>>
>> What all those ugly brackets are for?
>>
>
> Mark,
>
> Back in the day when C was king, or take many newer long established languages (C#, Java), the use of () has been widespread and mandated by the compilers. I have never heard anyone moan about the requirement to use parentheses. Now come Python in which parens are optional, and all of a sudden they are considered bad and apparently widely abandoned. Do you really not see that code with parens is much more pleasing visually? I could understand someone's reluctance to use parens if they are very new to programming and Pythons is their first language. But my impression here is that most group contributors are long-time programmers and have long used () where they are required. Again, I'm really surprised the community as a whole ignores the programming "heritage" and dumps the parens in a hea
>   rtbeat.
>
> Peter
>

Your words "the use of () has been widespread and mandated by the 
compilers" and "have long used () where they are required".  As they are 
neither mandated nor required in Python it just wastes the time of 
anybody reading code as they have to parse something that offers nothing 
except visual noise.  As for being "visually pleasing" that's simply 
laughable.  I want to be able to read code, not hang it in an art gallery.

-- 
Cheers.

Mark Lawrence