Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!cs.uu.nl!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.094
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.81; '*S*': 0.00; 'iterate': 0.09; 'does,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'worse.': 0.16; 'zeros': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'written': 0.21; 'earlier': 0.24; 'source': 0.25; 'code:': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'correct': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; '(which': 0.31; 'accidentally': 0.31; 'bug?': 0.31; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'turn': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'starting': 0.37; 'expected': 0.38; 'somebody': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'simply': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; '30,': 0.65; 'smith': 0.68; 'results': 0.69; 'ending': 0.78; 'not:': 0.91; '2013': 0.98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zVMY9EXRxMzMy9FsDYZrBNUWFLowkC/hA2yP68V+Ix0=; b=VYrctdJ4oEtJM6Tm7rQUxDBffDAfokGo95TMb5tk+SUkhwyRiIhL7lk7KliZ8+v113 sF65E6iw7l5AP+IWT3/dRpgTjUM13l82aPfOZ4P+vl/BvGe4fDcH8VlRa428Ks2nf9P2 0rS5zbkXyi2FBBOINo66HGUiVQ2s9pesAmK/N1tqVNYQmvv0eqfUgehpG4KAedjp2+No 6Ej6uN5K7oZko7cAEXRBrhvD3lFnO/n2YSx3tSSw6lScTi8vBhPokxclG+npnl1v3gOX KEu2kdjn79L8VdSi7LRHyTSNARYL6kMVfzVFQ4Yv+UxsDAMoGGv+xQrz8B0JEQTpuXfw V2cQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.155.67 with SMTP id vu3mr4517000vdb.94.1369918707572; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <roy-B251F4.08401630052013@news.panix.com>
References: <5f101d70-e51f-4531-9153-c92ee2486fd9@googlegroups.com> <51a1fc7b$0$30002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <2abf4e9c-8c3b-4e2f-80c9-50c1f1d75c9d@googlegroups.com> <51a4b5a1$0$29966$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <04b90c02-833a-4bad-88ad-ab71178b8f79@googlegroups.com> <51a6df59$0$11118$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2395.1369891346.3114.python-list@python.org> <roy-B251F4.08401630052013@news.panix.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 22:58:27 +1000
Subject: Re: Short-circuit Logic
From: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To: python-list@python.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.2415.1369918710.3114.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 21
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1369918710 news.xs4all.nl 15990 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57957
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:46482

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
> if somebody were to accidentally drop three zeros into the source code:
>
>> x = 1000
>> while x < 173:
>>     print(x)
>>     x += 1
>
> should the loop just quietly not execute (which is what it will do
> here)?  Will that make your program correct again, or will it simply
> turn this into a difficult to find bug?  If you're really worried about
> that, why not:

If you iterate from 1000 to 173, you get nowhere. This is the expected
behaviour; this is what a C-style for loop would be written as, it's
what range() does, it's the normal thing. Going from a particular
starting point to a particular ending point that's earlier than the
start results in no iterations. The alternative would be an infinite
number of iterations, which is far far worse.

ChrisA