Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.086 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.83; '*S*': 0.00; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'subject:python': 0.11; 'apache': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'guess': 0.27; 'all.': 0.28; 'cgi': 0.29; 'e.g.': 0.30; 'thursday,': 0.30; 'zero': 0.33; 'handle': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'thank': 0.36; 'october': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'easier': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'from:no real name:2**0': 0.60; 'out!': 0.84; 'received:209.85.214.184': 0.84; 'received:mail- ob0-f184.google.com': 0.84; 'clearing': 0.91 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:22:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.2.84.130; posting-account=m6Dr7woAAAB9IOKFAlcVRGS6noWmjjMP References: <98b7e362-14fd-4721-84c8-ae1bc11febac@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 193.2.84.130 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: python scripts for web From: chip9munk@gmail.com To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 8 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1350552135 news.xs4all.nl 6953 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57288 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:31614 On Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:42:56 AM UTC+2, Zero Piraeus wrote: > That is exactly what a webserver does. Is there some reason you don't > want to use e.g. Apache to handle the requests? no reason at all. so i guess the solution is much easier then I have anticipated. So i guess in that case i do not need cgi or anything? Thank you for clearing that out!