Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.42!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.006 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; '21,': 0.07; 'subject:question': 0.08; 'advice.': 0.09; 'returns,': 0.09; 'whichever': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'sat,': 0.15; '0.03': 0.16; 'measurement': 0.16; 'real.': 0.16; 'subject:coding': 0.16; 'to:addr:pearwood.info': 0.16; 'to:addr:steve+comp.lang.python': 0.16; "to:name:steven d'aprano": 0.16; 'write.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'code.': 0.20; 'assuming': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'second': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'subject:/': 0.28; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'unlikely': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; 'received:209.85.160.46': 0.32; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'so,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'easier': 0.38; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'most': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'jul': 0.65; 'million': 0.72; 'difference!': 0.84; 'subject:Basic': 0.84; 'faster.': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=PE8OUPqBhgdwp3/yLf2cX3x9s+9wljCKLiyIAODJqJc=; b=juYMN5gIMtXxoZhEf4Rd+VZ4hdXxenKlJ63lVra6gke/fdn7ZUDIB4B9kQGg/VMhj6 kJwdUJq4sNKT717lC6exjzrXBOuD4ynOTUlHSrS8Gxzw07Rcns+LAvlRfyytXrFq4cZ1 XCymYPuId1toPWaNTKlin8cWG+LI01FYEagnCGj+qb/Bh2sh8OpncKc5VXgohCWJSmLw sB/LNBM6eNCXepKNmvamd3Gjl+QPg7ims0oMXftK9bhdh/0CAcbi8h8Mxpk6ncFOOBaI qpmqwik4K7eLUGR+BPqdcfNBFVH0b91s4Yy0sai6iMBxk1BnONDEvV8vXrUWwViH0spF 19xA== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <500a711f$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> References: <500a711f$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> From: Devin Jeanpierre Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 21:31:31 -0400 Subject: Re: Basic question about speed/coding style/memory To: "Steven D'Aprano" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 19 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1342920734 news.xs4all.nl 6920 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:32781 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:25786 On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > So there is approximately 0.03 second difference per TWO MILLION > if...else blocks, or about 15 nanoseconds each. This is highly unlikely > to be the bottleneck in your code. Assuming the difference is real, and > not just measurement error, the difference is insignificant. It's probably real. For if-else, the true case needs to make a jump before it returns, but for if-return, there's no jump and the return is inlined. -- Devin > So, don't worry about which is faster. Write whichever is more natural, > easier to read and write. The most important advice. Even when it's a larger difference! :) -- Devin