Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: non printable (moving away from Perl) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:22:16 +0100 Organization: None Lines: 62 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de GyDjxhFDZSLAgwFDXaxwbgK5d7WiqJ5j2hKhMN52s8IA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'lines,': 0.05; 'python3': 0.05; 'sys': 0.05; 'newline': 0.07; 'lookup': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'def': 0.13; 'compares': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; 'defined': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'performing': 0.23; 'import': 0.24; 'script': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'function': 0.28; 'idea': 0.28; 'skip:u 20': 0.28; 'cat': 0.29; 'perl': 0.29; 'skip:_ 10': 0.32; 'class': 0.33; 'file': 0.34; 'false': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'things': 0.38; 'subject:from': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'below:': 0.71 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57bd9af8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.13.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:104621 Fillmore wrote: > On 03/11/2016 07:13 AM, Wolfgang Maier wrote: >> One lesson for Perl regex users is that in Python many things can be >> solved without regexes. How about defining: >> >> printable = {chr(n) for n in range(32, 127)} >> >> then using: >> >> if (set(my_string) - set(printable)): >> break > > seems computationally heavy. I have a file with about 70k lines, of which > only 20 contain "funny" chars. > > ANy idea on how I can create a script that compares Perl speed vs. Python > speed in performing the cleaning operation? Try for line in ...: if has_nonprint(line): continue ... with the has_nonprint() function as defined below: $ cat isprint.py import sys import unicodedata class Lookup(dict): def __missing__(self, n): c = chr(n) cat = unicodedata.category(c) if cat in {'Cs', 'Cn', 'Zl', 'Cc', 'Zp'}: self[n] = c return c else: self[n] = None return None lookup = Lookup() lookup[10] = None # allow newline def has_nonprint(s): return bool(s.translate(lookup)) $ python3 -i isprint.py >>> has_nonprint("foo") False >>> has_nonprint("foo\n") False >>> has_nonprint("foo\t") True >>> has_nonprint("\0foo") True