Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.042 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:language': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'subject:python': 0.11; 'convey': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'pitch': 0.16; 'received:209.85.216.53': 0.16; 'whatsoever': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'discussion': 0.20; 'putting': 0.20; 'either.': 0.22; 'sends': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'convention': 0.27; 'necessary.': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'subject:list': 0.28; 'chris': 0.28; '(unless': 0.29; 'material': 0.33; 'text,': 0.33; 'likely': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'especially': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'posting': 0.35; 'sometimes': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'list.': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'alone': 0.36; 'author': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'received:209.85.216': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'nothing': 0.38; 'instead': 0.39; 'list,': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'face': 0.61; 'situation': 0.62; 'here': 0.65; 'unnecessary': 0.65; 'reply': 0.66; 'interest.': 0.78; '2:02': 0.84; 'different.': 0.84; 'face,': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CiaJrgBuOiJtRwlk2Qzut/Mwu28BGY7+Er329eXD3B8=; b=eobQqPRj8fPoLLxP1HIPhcI5EFafDKEiJxGRefcFicxEf7T+w5Brl/lOYG6+rWgPrl tcFdtiJ3HdTANNA9fvYpeAJ+tiVcnWw+gcLObirr12W9jc+Rp05gZxPOzdcFM+h/T7KM BZx+AD8CulUEz8pfKHUQpB4U5H7/HX+LlWv4gIXr4zteKk4GvpmiGPgyCbYnSjhXot2q JizOG+I4JQdN1oYjBA2xzDynhJmMEk/jjjo/pJZYjpI6bV2MkPcWQ2w39o5Dnlf9MEPn CYTnZTP+2J1xlQuir76vOvfJBD6IrTSMwjav7U8aFL8dcBSq6PrZL3BIADY5jNoKOxXP hyEg== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <507f3c6c$0$6599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <77361fb4-a59a-45b0-85e2-95472aec3716@n7g2000pbj.googlegroups.com> <8b0ebc42-52f2-442d-aa92-12eff32b9d0e@v9g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:37:16 -0400 Subject: Re: Aggressive language on python-list From: Dwight Hutto To: Chris Angelico Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 31 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1350535038 news.xs4all.nl 6871 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56990 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:31585 On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Dwight Hutto wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:06 AM, alex23 wrote: >>> On Oct 18, 2:02 pm, Dwight Hutto wrote: >>> [a public response to a private email] >>> >>> I really don't appreciate you pushing public a *private email >>> exchange*, especially when it has nothing whatsoever to do with this >>> list. >> >> Usually, etiquette dictates, that we hit "reply all". > > That's not actually true either. The convention is to reply to the > list with material that is edifying to the list, or to the author > alone if the situation calls for it. Using reply-all sends the author > a copy as well as putting it on-list, which is unnecessary (unless > it's likely the author isn't subscribed). It's completely unnecessary > to include the list in what's not of interest. > > And here I am, posting on-list something that's completely necessary. > (sigh* Alex, Dwight, can you two please cool down a bit? A little > calmness would improve this discussion significantly, methinks. > Sometimes an e-mail doesn't convey tone, or pitch of voice. If it were face to face, instead of text, things would be much different. -- Best Regards, David Hutto CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com