Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.062 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.88; '*S*': 0.00; 'rules.': 0.09; 'stated.': 0.09; 'subject:language': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'subject:python': 0.11; 'amendment': 0.16; 'discussion.': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'plus,': 0.16; 'received:209.85.216.53': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'community.': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; "i've": 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'subject:list': 0.28; 'implied': 0.29; 'no,': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'maybe': 0.29; 'that.': 0.30; 'gets': 0.32; 'certain': 0.33; 'goes': 0.33; 'says': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'acceptable': 0.35; 'law,': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'list.': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'wanted': 0.36; "wasn't": 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'received:209.85.216': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'behind': 0.38; 'nothing': 0.38; 'instead': 0.39; 'list,': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'decision': 0.60; 'stand': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'mentioned': 0.63; 'america,': 0.65; 'reply': 0.66; 'e-mail,': 0.66; 'stated': 0.69; 'saw': 0.75; 'around,': 0.84; 'constitution': 0.84; 'remained': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mu1ZFMeviB3jaqBkzUfSqXmucmo1EinPXOKre69hKbQ=; b=qr5hKASoZMk6dudtrd+3cA2uu/e1Zf4amLotGXqq4WCnHx6Dc68/2CRJo8xP4LMNjW nXw11elDDhuDERpkU+x4hDaJHvvTTiaX4RRJWPp5g7qh3Ry/UoArKcLNyhxKjWus2O8D uDBZt/BN9Y3GJ9SfsbZEvNHZdR5Z9nWA8qeUjV0ozp2U3ZoYG376QXbbOYZwb03DrC6Q x9mzxQrdE8CKs+Xf15zZC3UZsQEROqYSsJAxqKnQOua0/3f8vmzucWEnim+htO3Vwxn7 JklJRbf+DQVesD/tq9hbFM44MUimsHaJ7Ob6Pb2+TnO+/YKy1h2XL56ck5Hq0poUTfBl o6sg== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6fa85e9c-8675-4241-b7ed-1816a11a51eb@n2g2000pbp.googlegroups.com> References: <507f3c6c$0$6599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <77361fb4-a59a-45b0-85e2-95472aec3716@n7g2000pbj.googlegroups.com> <8b0ebc42-52f2-442d-aa92-12eff32b9d0e@v9g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> <6fa85e9c-8675-4241-b7ed-1816a11a51eb@n2g2000pbp.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:26:26 -0400 Subject: Re: Aggressive language on python-list From: Dwight Hutto To: alex23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 42 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1350534389 news.xs4all.nl 6911 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46345 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:31579 On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:11 AM, alex23 wrote: > On Oct 18, 2:05 pm, Dwight Hutto wrote: >> This is a public discussion. Maybe you just need to stand behind a >> loophole in the law, but the first amendment overrides that. > > I'm not in America, so your constitution means nothing to me. But you apparently want freedom of speech. > >> Plus, that is the standard. We discuss this as a community. You never >> stated you wanted it private, ad if you had, it would have remained >> that way. > > I *sent you a private response* because it wasn't relevant to the > list. You chose to re-include the list, No, lots of people hit 'reply' instead of 'reply all'. Read around, it gets stated all the time. The main response is don't reply privately, keep it on list, unless otherwise stated. which is an active decision > you had to make. Based on certain list's rules. Hit 'reply all' That is not acceptable behaviour, nor is it the > "standard". That's debatable, unless you implied that was your intention. As I've mentioned before...people can start arguing, and one replies off list, and then goes back on the list after a private e-mail, and says ahah, see how they're acting, and they never saw the private reply you sent. -- Best Regards, David Hutto CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com