Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.135 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.74; '*S*': 0.01; 'python.': 0.02; 'python': 0.09; 'fix.': 0.09; 'highlighting': 0.09; 'indication': 0.09; 'medical,': 0.09; 'received:mail-qc0-f174.google.com': 0.09; 'subject:language': 0.09; 'threads.': 0.09; 'throw': 0.09; 'yeah,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'thread': 0.11; 'subject:python': 0.11; 'times,': 0.13; 'do,': 0.15; 'anymore': 0.16; 'attitude.': 0.16; 'balls': 0.16; 'chasing': 0.16; 'cherry': 0.16; 'defence': 0.16; 'ego': 0.16; 'merely': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'society.': 0.16; 'trash': 0.16; 'vulgar': 0.16; 'wei': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'trying': 0.21; 'are.': 0.22; 'of.': 0.22; 'satisfying': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'demonstrate': 0.23; 'references': 0.23; "i've": 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'common': 0.26; 'language.': 0.27; 'then.': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'subject:list': 0.28; 'all.': 0.28; 'fine': 0.28; 'behaviour': 0.29; 'convince': 0.29; 'diagnose': 0.29; 'improves': 0.29; 'thinks': 0.29; 'character': 0.29; 'no,': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'maybe': 0.29; 'more,': 0.32; 'support,': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'getting': 0.33; "aren't": 0.33; 'clarify': 0.33; 'doubt': 0.33; 'interaction': 0.33; 'rid': 0.33; 'right?': 0.33; 'surely': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; 'everyone': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'self': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'fail': 0.35; 'especially': 0.35; 'doing': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; "won't": 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'alone': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'bad': 0.37; 'level': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'quite': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'received:209.85.216': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'between': 0.63; 'capable': 0.63; 'hear': 0.63; 'information,': 0.63; 'fun': 0.64; 'here': 0.65; 'become': 0.65; 'prime': 0.65; 'due': 0.66; 'life': 0.66; 'secure': 0.67; 'social': 0.69; 'individuals': 0.69; 'direct': 0.69; 'lack': 0.71; 'realized': 0.71; 'saving': 0.72; 'informed': 0.75; 'yourself,': 0.75; 'yourself': 0.77; 'alone,': 0.84; 'asshole': 0.84; 'bridge.': 0.84; 'defensive': 0.84; 'disruptive': 0.84; 'emotionally,': 0.84; 'financially,': 0.84; 'fucking': 0.84; 'hugely': 0.84; 'laid': 0.84; 'lean': 0.84; 'moral': 0.84; 'overcome,': 0.84; 'pain': 0.84; 'psychology': 0.84; 'river,': 0.84; 'situations,': 0.84; 'superiority': 0.84; 'textbook': 0.84; 'understand,': 0.84; 'woman.': 0.84; 'comment.': 0.91; 'desperately': 0.91; 'dozens': 0.91; 'fish': 0.91; 'individuals,': 0.91; 'afford': 0.93; 'convinced': 0.93; 'dreams': 0.93; 'faith': 0.93; 'confidence': 0.95; 'have.': 0.95; 'serious': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5LJiXR0An2DnjeUGjwlxptp1pWXtHa7nW5pOlknkZjg=; b=Cl5082WUiN8BelkLiPchIn4N0WZBklFuAbXc67AawVne5x+80rK0ptZqmEOPAoXhw+ soU3F0Ab9/B88U/LMeGbegM4EwccNPoT2rO7rL9PZ20b1vCFyXjZ8mA8bTX5BoYnzx8g nSH5tGCLKrW8gnn1hiEliV0Nuwh4bOQxZ8/AMtJCdV2RZIuMQ/FYzasl/mZvlCLTdRn/ +Pt8SFLbqYGyz/lnXpAh4t90wpHFYWDdms7AKG5tOFNpkGtCVVOFz5qgTKD8BOIXY6mz lp+2UG2UL6vj0DYumSK+2zKOE7p62f724vlgrrKD3lnx0rH2kPDELcSP/Ba0pGpbLoTy T8OQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <85099bc2-fa24-4cc5-bd94-3015b9af694f@googlegroups.com> <507d900e$0$6599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <5a713407-d82f-4067-8ffa-6b8b66c1edf1@googlegroups.com> <507e1baf$0$6599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <35b41895-45d9-4f2e-9285-2bb0c36fb2a6@googlegroups.com> <507f3c6c$0$6599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <77361fb4-a59a-45b0-85e2-95472aec3716@n7g2000pbj.googlegroups.com> <8b0ebc42-52f2-442d-aa92-12eff32b9d0e@v9g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:02:37 -0400 Subject: Re: Aggressive language on python-list From: Dwight Hutto To: wu wei Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 146 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1350532961 news.xs4all.nl 6866 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53487 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:31571 On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:47 PM, wu wei wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Dwight Hutto > wrote: >> >> It's intended to be involved, witty, and as informed as I can be > > > You fail on every level here. According to your opinion. > >> >> No, I'm fine a s a monk until recently, when medical, and faith issues >> arose, and for your information, I've been laid quite a few times, and >> won't have a problem doing so again. > > > Yeah, you're full of confidence in yourself, you're not defensive at all. Confidence is a defence against individuals who want to cherry pick, and bring you down with propaganda that lacks anymore than a textbook approach...show some innovation please. > >> I've been out here 6-7 years getting my life together without chasing >> pussy. > > > When you use terms like "chasing pussy", that's probably a good indication > of why it's been 7 years since you last had any satisfying interaction with > a woman. That was a character flaw i had..."doc". I had to rid an addiction to saving women who were in bad situations, and clarify my mind as to who I want as a prime mate. > >> Not self righteous, again wrong. I've been the bad guy, and now I have >> to watch out for them, which seems self righteous, but it's merely the >> fact that I have to have a good public persona now. > > > But you _don't_ have a good public persona. You come across as someone > desperately trying to convince people that you're smarter and better than > you are. > Again, just your opinion of a few threads. When insulted, you either insult back, or ascert your intelligence. I took the higher ground. >> Go get to know a real few arrogant individuals, with superiority >> complexes before you comment. > > > I have. I'm speaking from direct experience here, and you demonstrate a lot > in common with such people. You lack serious perspective n this subject, so stop trying to say I'm arrogant. >> >> If anything, I have an inferiority complex that comes out when I'm >> downed by someone. > > > Then don't react the way you do, because it doesn't do you any favours. > >> It's been that way in my socioeconomic upbringing I'm trying to >> overcome, so you're preaching to the choir. > > > Oh boo hoo, you've had pain in your life, you're surely the only person on > the planet. > I give myself the same fucking thought everytime I have to feel symptoms which I',m trying to afford the cost to diagnose , and fix. So cry me a fucking river, and boohoo about my vulgar language. >> >> Doubt it. After 6-7 years of leaving sluts, and whores alone, I've >> realized I need to be secure emotionally, physically, financially, and >> spiritually. > > > You don't see the hypocrisy in claiming you're after _spiritual_ and > _emotional_ security and calling women "sluts and whores"? > You should have met them. They may have become more, but that's who I was trying to save from other bad relationships. Use the little psychology you understand, and you'll see I was trying to save my mother. > You're going to die alone with that attitude. > >> >> Go insult a troll, because I like to fish off the top of the bridge. > > > Things like this really aren't as witty as you think. Your ego couldn't take the insult, could it? > >> >> Well above trash such as yourself who like to bring people down for >> fun due to their own superiority complexes. > > > No, I just like highlighting the huge discrepancies between what people > think & say they are and how they behave, especially when that person is a > hugely disruptive asshole who thinks the incomprehensible crap they write > assists people in learning Python. Provide some references please, instead of a blanketed insult. > > You're in serious need of self-reflection at a level I'm not convinced > you're capable of. You should hear some thought projection I have about my own past behaviour then. Maybe you should start another crybaby thread on the You mean a request for social critique that improves myself, then I'll throw a temper tantrum. Maybe you wanna come watch, or maybe you have the balls to participate(but that would be just my old behaviour). > Python list to find out whether everyone else agrees. Or hell, you're the > CEO of your company, I'm sure you have dozens if not hundreds of employees > you can lean on for moral support, right? Just started, so I'm a startup, and you just insulted the majority of the list with good dreams of being a productive citizen of society. -- Best Regards, David Hutto CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com