Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'languages.': 0.04; 'explicitly': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'attribute': 0.07; 'expressions': 0.07; 'float': 0.07; 'function:': 0.09; 'internet:': 0.09; 'literal': 0.09; 'parsing': 0.09; 'python:': 0.09; 'to)': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'random': 0.14; 'analysing': 0.16; 'brackets.': 0.16; 'different?': 0.16; 'earlier.': 0.16; 'evaluating': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'literal,': 0.16; 'literal.': 0.16; 'magic': 0.16; 'omitting': 0.16; 'operators,': 0.16; 'quirks': 0.16; 'rule.': 0.16; 'subject:user': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; 'rules': 0.22; 'error': 0.23; '31,': 0.24; 'looks': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'least': 0.26; 'somewhere': 0.26; 'asking': 0.27; 'skip:" 20': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; '[1]': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'array': 0.29; 'returned': 0.30; 'said,': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'gives': 0.31; '(unless': 0.31; 'exceptions': 0.31; 'there.': 0.32; 'languages': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'cases': 0.33; "can't": 0.35; 'common': 0.35; 'convert': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'similar': 0.36; 'subject:New': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'nov': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'list,': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'von': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'little': 0.38; 'recent': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'aside': 0.39; "couldn't": 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'according': 0.40; 'subject: / ': 0.60; 'break': 0.61; 'mentioned': 0.61; 'new': 0.61; 'name:': 0.61; 'john': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'such': 0.63; 'myself': 0.63; '30,': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'therefore': 0.72; '1960s.': 0.84; '5.4': 0.84; 'message)': 0.84; 'differences': 0.93; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lqyen4nOscslwmQKGCgBaR7Od1ayK9rq0BgLGgLzjUw=; b=X/7gVBH0+3iYeVbYLdc7MpA1KNC9Alzze6lwB2Loiin9iu+Qc4D2dW3b4ZGddN0RaT FkWmXwwx5KT20CEZyK7peEQT2WZP8uGjRprbDVvq8LZ70YjytERw/i8A2nGeCF5VCU9J 1ShyvHwmTrrIdx2g2S6ADmPVDbxpaj0EWpVIhsGtcOgYdRhLUd8zCuahFPcgQlpag1sq bbQ+y+stm+FgTncXhqVS6Z3kAW8KnLTsgYGR3FM6AH1lKW0uItTFMW7CZDMW34fkhNWJ tab0uecQJsRlej1MRk7mG8sSAYjEvud/vUCc8S/a2XKj9mmDmEloIudXvdZsoTu7NcCE jAAA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.99.99 with SMTP id ep3mr24290540pbb.107.1384075376296; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 01:22:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <-JadnUirYuhUruPPnZ2dnUVZ8rSdnZ2d@bt.com> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 20:22:56 +1100 Subject: Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 55 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1384075379 news.xs4all.nl 15976 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37636 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:58995 On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > On Sat, 2013-11-09, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:08 AM, John von Horn wrote: > ... >>> * Why not allow floater=float(int1/int2) - rather than floater=float >>> (int1)/float(int2)? >>> >>> Give me a float (or an error message) from evaluating everything in the >>> brackets. Don't make me explicitly convert everything myself (unless I >>> want to) >> >> As others have said, what you're asking for is actually magic. One of >> the rules of Python - one for which I'm not aware of any exceptions - >> is that you can always take a subexpression out and give it a new >> name: > > And it's not just Python: programming languages have been designed > that way since at least the 1960s. People are used to analysing > expressions inside and out according to rules common for almost all > languages. That's true to at least some extent, but quite a few languages have differences here and there. In C, there's no such thing as an array literal, only an initializer list, so: /* This works: */ int month_days[] = {31, 28, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31}; int this_month_days = month_days[this_month]; /* This doesn't: */ int three = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}[2]; PHP had similar issues up until a *very* recent version (5.3 or 5.4 or something), where you couldn't dereference an array returned by a function: //Works: $arr = func(); $val = $arr[5]; //Didn't work until recently, and therefore can't be trusted for //deployment to random systems across the internet: $val = func()[5]; JavaScript has magic around the dot and function-call operators, as I mentioned earlier. Lots of other languages have some little quirk somewhere that breaks this rule; some have a LOT of quirks that break this rule. Does Python have any? Aside from parsing oddities like attribute access on a literal integer[1], are there any cases where two expressions yielding the same object are in any way different? ChrisA [1] You can write "(1234).to_bytes(2,'big')" but omitting the parens gives a SyntaxError because it looks like the start of a float literal.