Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'parameter': 0.05; 'subject:two': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'similarly,': 0.09; 'subclass': 0.09; 'subject:parameters': 0.09; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'arrays.': 0.16; 'lisp': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'retrieves': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'sublist': 0.16; 'tuples,': 0.16; 'wrapping': 0.16; 'call.': 0.19; 'programming': 0.19; 'jan': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'objects,': 0.23; 'function': 0.25; 'expect': 0.25; 'parameters': 0.26; 'object': 0.26; 'class': 0.29; 'do.': 0.30; 'objects.': 0.30; 'functional': 0.31; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'list': 0.33; 'list.': 0.33; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'languages': 0.35; 'lists,': 0.36; 'received:org': 0.38; 'creates': 0.38; 'linked': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'subject: (': 0.39; 'perhaps': 0.39; 'header:Mime- Version:1': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'everyone': 0.40; 'really': 0.40; 'easily': 0.60; 'back': 0.63; 'free': 0.63; 'discipline': 0.67 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: scope of function parameters (take two) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 11:59:21 -0400 References: <201105310713.24842.wolfgang@rohdewald.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: rain.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1306857577 news.xs4all.nl 49179 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:36438 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:6733 On 5/31/2011 2:37 AM, Henry Olders wrote: > what I want is a function that is free of side effects back through > the parameters passed in the function call. You can get that by refraining from mutating parameter objects. Simple as that. Just do not expect Python to enforce that discipline on everyone else. To be really functional, and never mutate objects, do not use Python lists, which are arrays. Use linked-list trees, like Lisp languages and perhaps others do. One can easily do this with tuples, or a subclass of tuples, or a class wrapping tuples. Linked-lists and functional programming go together because prepending to a linked list creates a new object while appending to a Python list mutates an existing list. Similarly, popping from a linked list retrieves an item and an existing sublist while popping from a Python list retrieves and item and mutates the list. -- Terry Jan Reedy